The United States Department of Labor (DOL) has resolved a long-standing and frequently litigated issue under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA): whether intermittent FMLA leave includes time spent traveling to and from approved medical appointments. In a January 2026 opinion letter, the DOL confirmed that such travel time is FMLA-protected.
Background
When medically necessary, FMLA leave may be taken intermittently or on a reduced schedule, including for medical appointments related to a qualifying condition. While it has long been settled that FMLA leave covers time spent in the medical appointment itself, neither the statute nor its implementing regulations expressly addressed whether travel time was also protected. Prior to the opinion letter, case law on this issue was limited and the DOL had not issued formal guidance.
DOL’s Position: Travel Time is FMLA-Protected
The DOL concluded that travel time associated with a qualifying medical appointment is part of FMLA-protected leave. The agency explained that “[p]art and parcel of obtaining care and continuing treatment from a medical provider may require the employee to travel to the provider’s location.” Accordingly, eligible employees may take FMLA leave for time spent traveling to and from a healthcare provider for treatment of their own serious health condition or that of a covered family member.
Limits on Covered Travel
The DOL emphasized that FMLA coverage is limited to travel directly related to the qualifying medical appointment. Time spent on unrelated activities is not FMLA-protected. For example, if an employee attends a medical appointment but then stops to run errands or go to lunch before returning to work, the time spent on those unrelated activities is not covered by the FMLA. Employers may continue to discipline employees for absences that are not attributable to a serious health condition or qualifying caregiving activity. Notably, the opinion letter does not address whether stops that are arguably related to medical care – such as picking up a prescription at a pharmacy – would qualify as covered travel time.
Medical Certification and Travel Time
Employers may require employees to submit a medical certification supporting the need for FMLA leave. A sufficient certification must include statutory information such as the date the serious health condition began, its probable duration, and appropriate medical facts within the healthcare provider’s knowledge. However, medical certification need not reference or estimate travel time for that time to be protected, as healthcare providers generally lack knowledge of an employee’s commute or transportation logistics. Employers therefore may not deny FMLA protection for travel time solely because it is not included in the certification.
Scheduling Obligations Still Apply
The opinion letter also reinforces a commonly overlooked requirement: when leave is foreseeable for planned medical treatment, employees must consult with their employers and make reasonable efforts to schedule appointments in a manner that minimizes workplace disruption, subject to approval by the healthcare provider.
Key Takeaways for Employers
This guidance provides clarity but underscores the importance of careful administration of intermittent FMLA leave. Employers should update FMLA policies and practices to reflect that travel time to and from qualifying medical appointments may be protected. Additionally, employers should train managers and HR personnel on the limits of covered travel time and potential misuse and continue to require and review medical certifications for statutory sufficiency. KMK’s Labor & Employment team is available to assist employers with compliance challenges involving intermittent FMLA leave.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2026 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Greg Robinson assists his clients in navigating the complex world of workplace laws and regulations. He has counseled clients on a wide array of employment matters, including wage and hour disputes, discrimination charges ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 2024. While in law ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- EEOC
- FMLA
- Transgender Issues
- Discrimination
- Diversity
- Social Media
- Title VII
- Coronavirus
- Employer Policies
- Religion Discrimination
- Employment Litigation
- Department of Labor
- Wage & Hour
- Overtime Pay
- Employer Rules
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Paid Leave Laws
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Artificial Intelligence
- OSHA
- Tax Credit
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- National Labor Relations Board
- FLSA
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Department of Justice
- Privacy
- Compliance
- NLRA
- Supreme Court
- Arbitration
- Worker Classification
- Federal Trade Commission
- Harassment
- Workplace Accommodations
- Litigation
- IRS
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- EEOC Rescinds Anti-Harassment Guidance Addressing Transgender Protections
- The EEOC’s Renewed Focus on Employer DEI Programs in 2026
- The Commute Counts: DOL Confirms FMLA Leave Extends to Travel Time
- Expansion of State Paid Leave Laws in 2026
- Work Opportunity Tax Credit At Risk: Use It Before You Lose It
- IRS Releases Additional Guidance on New Tip and Overtime Tax Deductions for 2025
- EEOC Takes Aim at Perceived Anti-American Bias
- Ohio “Mini-WARN” Act Now In Effect: Key Compliance Takeaways for Employers
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price

