On Friday, July 17, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published in the Federal Register a Final Rule detailing sweeping new requirements for students who wish to maintain their status in the US. Instead of Duration of Status (D/S), DHS will now grant students a period of admission with a fixed end-date to match a student’s I-20, no more than a 4-year period. This will require students to file for extensions of status when a program takes longer than initially intended, when changing to a new program, and when completing practical training associated with their degree program.
Background
In 1979, the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) began granting students periods of admission for Duration of Status, or D/S. Since 2015, the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) has issued the modern version of Forms I-20 to students to reflect updates to their period of admission. Students must request updated Forms I-20 from their school to ensure maintenance of their student status at all times.
Prior to the Final Rule, students were not required to separately file to extend their student status with USCIS, as their visas and associated I-94 records were issued for “Duration of Status”. “Duration of Status” meant that a student was admitted for the duration of their program of study plus any authorized practical training, as reflected by their I-20 and any Employment Authorization Document (EAD) issued for practical training related to their program of study.
DHS Final Rule
The DHS Final Rule, as published in the Federal Register, makes notable changes to the maintenance of student status:
- DHS will no longer grant students periods of admission for Duration of Status or D/S and will instead grant periods of admission as listed on related I-94s for a fixed date to match the original I-20 end-date, which in no case will be longer than 4 years;
- Students who have completed a course of study may only enroll in a higher educational level. E.g., Foreign national students may not complete a second bachelor’s degree, a second master’s degree, etc.
- Students seeking to transfer schools while enrolled in an undergraduate program can only do so after completing one year of study at the school listed on their original I-20 form;
- Students generally may not transfer schools or change their educational program while enrolled in a graduate degree program; and
- DHS will decrease the “grace period” for F-1 students who withdraw from or complete their course of study from 60 to 30 days.
Effective Date of Rule
The Final Rule makes substantive changes to existing regulations and can therefore only become effective upon review by Congress. Pending congressional review, the rule is set to go into effect on September 15, 2026.
The Rule is severable, meaning that if portions of the Rule are found invalid, the remaining portions of the Rule will still go into effect.
The Rule gives DHS flexibility to delay the effective date for the provisions on enrollment in subsequent degree programs and transfer rules for graduate students.
Students who have already applied for OPT or STEM OPT and have pending applications as of September 15, 2026 will not be required to file for extensions of status to cover their period of valid OPT or STEM OPT.
Students who have valid I-94 records listing D/S as of September 15, 2026, should treat their status as expiring as of their I-20 expiration date or OPT/STEM OPT expiration date (if applicable), but no later than November 14, 2030. Students with grandfathered “D/S” periods of admission must extend their status prior to their effective end-date.
Key Takeaways
Once the Final Rule takes effect, students should work closely with their Designated School Officials (DSOs) and immigration attorneys to ensure that they maintain their student status by holding a valid I-20 and I-94 record.
If a student’s visa and I-94 record reflect a fixed date, that student must ensure they have applied for an extension of status using Form I-539 with USCIS prior to the end-date on their I-94, or have left the US as of the end-date on their I-94 and will re-apply for a new student visa with an extended validity period from an embassy abroad.
As the Rule is subject to Congressional review, severable, and likely to be litigated, KMK will closely monitor any effective changes to the Rule’s implementation in the coming months. KMK’s immigration professionals are available to advise employers and students on their maintenance of student status in light of the new Rule.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2026 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Of Counsel
Olivia Kues serves as Of Counsel in the Labor & Employment Group with a focus on immigration law. She represents clients across a broad range of industries, including healthcare, professional sports, information technology, and ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- FMLA
- Employment Law
- EEOC
- Immigration
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor
- Wage & Hour
- Diversity
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Discrimination
- FLSA
- Coronavirus
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Social Media
- Sexual Harassment
- Sixth Circuit
- Employer Policies
- Title VII
- National Enforcement Plan
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Transgender Issues
- Employer Rules
- Holiday Policies
- Workplace Violence
- Overtime Pay
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Artificial Intelligence
- Privacy
- Department of Justice
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- NLRA
- Compliance
- Paid Leave Laws
- Supreme Court
- Workplace Accommodations
- Tax Credit
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Litigation
- IRS
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Disability Discrimination
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Medical Marijuana
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ADAAA
- ERISA
- Race Discrimination
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Disability
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- US Court of Appeals puts $100,000 H-1B Fee on Hold Again
- Asking Is Protected: Sixth Circuit Expands FMLA Retaliation Protections
- New DHS Rule Will Restrict Student Periods of Admission from Duration of Status to Fixed End Date
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
- EEO-1 Reporting on the Chopping Block: What Employers Need to Know
- DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
