<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.kmklaw.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Keating Muething &amp; Klekamp PLL Home Page</title>
					<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Keating Muething &amp; Klekamp PLL Home Page.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 01:30:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain
Compliant</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/tps-haiti-termination-how-employers-can-ensure-i-9-records-remain-compliant</link>
<dc:creator>Olivia C. Kues</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/tps-haiti-termination-how-employers-can-ensure-i-9-records-remain-compliant</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, June 25, 2026 the Supreme Court ruled in <em>Mullin v. Doe</em> that the Trump administration&rsquo;s termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti was lawful, meaning immigration status and work authorization approved based on TPS Haiti will expire July 1, 2026. Employers should carefully review affected I-9 documentation and reverify any I-9 set to expire.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s
2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/What-Employers-Should-Know-About-the-EEOC-2025-2029-National-Enforcement-Plan</link>
<dc:creator>Christopher M. Jones, Kelzé M. Riley</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/What-Employers-Should-Know-About-the-EEOC-2025-2029-National-Enforcement-Plan</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:00:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On June 4, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (&ldquo;EEOC&rdquo;) approved its new <a href="https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2026-06/NEP_-_signed.pdf">National Enforcement Plan</a> (&ldquo;NEP&rdquo;) for Fiscal Years 2025&ndash;2029, replacing the agency&rsquo;s prior Strategic Enforcement Plan. The NEP establishes the EEOC&rsquo;s nationwide enforcement priorities and signals a significant shift in how the agency intends to investigate and litigate employment discrimination claims. Although the NEP applies to employers across industries, its implications may be particularly significant for health care organizations, many of which operate federally funded workforce programs or maintain longstanding diversity initiatives.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/beyond-paid-time-off-the-legal-side-of-holiday-policies</link>
<dc:creator>Christopher M. Jones, Kelzé M. Riley</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/beyond-paid-time-off-the-legal-side-of-holiday-policies</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 09:00:03 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>An often overlooked benefit provided by private-sector employers is paid federal and state holidays. Though many do so, private-sector employers generally are not required to: close, provide paid time off, pay a holiday premium, or treat holiday hours as &ldquo;hours worked&rdquo; for overtime calculations.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>EEO-1 Reporting on the Chopping Block: What Employers Need to Know</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/eeo-1-reporting-on-the-chopping-block-what-employers-need-to-know</link>
<dc:creator>Gregory J. Robinson</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/eeo-1-reporting-on-the-chopping-block-what-employers-need-to-know</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 09:00:04 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 14, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission submitted plans to the White House for a proposed rule that would eliminate the longstanding requirement that large employers report workplace demographics through the EEO-1 Component 1 report. While a formal proposal has not yet been announced, the move signals a significant potential shift in federal employment data collection.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/dol-proposes-new-joint-employer-rule-what-employers-need-to-know</link>
<dc:creator>Christopher M. Jones, Kelzé M. Riley</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/dol-proposes-new-joint-employer-rule-what-employers-need-to-know</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:00:05 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking aimed at clarifying when multiple entities may be considered &ldquo;joint employers&rdquo; under federal wage and hour laws. If finalized, the rule would create a single, more uniform standard under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and align that analysis with the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (MSPA), marking a significant step toward consistency across these statutes.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision
Means for Your Workplace Agreements</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/arbitration-agreements-take-a-hit-what-the-sixth-circuits-efaa-decision-means-for-your-workplace-agreements</link>
<dc:creator>Gregory J. Robinson</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/arbitration-agreements-take-a-hit-what-the-sixth-circuits-efaa-decision-means-for-your-workplace-agreements</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:00:06 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Many employers include mandatory arbitration agreements as a standard part of onboarding, expecting that workplace disputes will be resolved outside of court. &nbsp;A recent decision from the Sixth Circuit, however, underscores an important&mdash;and expansive&mdash;limitation on those agreements when sexual harassment is alleged.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex
Framework</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/bourbon-ballots-and-bargaining-orders-sixth-circuit-rejects-nlrbs-cemex-framework</link>
<dc:creator>Kelzé M. Riley, Kasey L. Bond</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/bourbon-ballots-and-bargaining-orders-sixth-circuit-rejects-nlrbs-cemex-framework</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:00:07 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Most employers understand that unfair labor practices during a union organizing campaign carry significant legal consequences. In recent years, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had ordered employers who engaged in unfair labor practices to bargain with a union regardless of whether the union won the election. In a decision issued on March 6, 2026, the Sixth Circuit (covering Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee) limited the NLRB&rsquo;s ability issue such bargaining orders, rejecting the NLRB&rsquo;s recently announced <em>Cemex </em>framework for ordering employers to recognize and bargain with unions.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for
Future Compliance</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/independent-contractor-and-joint-employer-rules-looking-to-the-past-for-future-compliance</link>
<dc:creator>Gregory J. Robinson</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/independent-contractor-and-joint-employer-rules-looking-to-the-past-for-future-compliance</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:00:08 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Federal labor and employment standards continue to shift as agencies revisit rules issued over the past several years. For HR professionals, staying current on these developments is critical to managing compliance risk and workforce strategy.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>New Requirements for Employers in California</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/new-requirements-for-employers-in-california</link>
<dc:creator>Kasey L. Bond</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/new-requirements-for-employers-in-california</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:00:09 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Doing business in California has always been a daunting task for employers because of California&rsquo;s onerous regulations for employers. Now that we are nearly two months into 2026, it is important to ensure you are complying with the most recent regulations.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Back to the Office: The EEOC Clarifies the Limits of Telework Under the ADA</title>
				<link>https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/back-to-the-office-the-eeoc-clarifies-the-limits-of-telework-under-the-ada</link>
<dc:creator>Christopher M. Jones, Kelzé M. Riley</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>labor-employment/back-to-the-office-the-eeoc-clarifies-the-limits-of-telework-under-the-ada</guid>

					<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 09:00:10 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>On February 11, 2026, the EEOC released guidance addressing telework as a reasonable accommodation under the Rehabilitation Act and Americans with Disabilities Act (&ldquo;ADA&rdquo;), providing a framework for employers managing return-to-office requests. The guidance clarifies that telework may be required as a reasonable accommodation when it is necessary for an employee to perform the essential functions of the position or to access equal employment opportunities and benefits. It further explains that telework is not required where the essential functions must be performed on-site or where the request is based solely on preference or on general symptom management. The guidance also affirms employers may re-evaluate and modify or discontinue previously approved telework arrangements through the interactive process.</p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>