On Thursday, June 25, 2026 the Supreme Court ruled in Mullin v. Doe that the Trump administration’s termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti was lawful, meaning immigration status and work authorization approved based on TPS Haiti will expire July 1, 2026. Employers should carefully review affected I-9 documentation and reverify any I-9 set to expire.
Background
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is authorized by Congress to designate nationals of certain countries for Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, for temporary periods which may later be renewed. Designations are often granted to countries affected by war or armed conflicts, environmental disasters, epidemics, and other extraordinary and temporary conditions.
Nationals of a TPS-designated country are eligible to file an application for TPS and related work authorization, as long as they meet certain eligibility requirements. If approved, TPS may grant an individual the right to both reside and work in the US legally.
Haiti was first designated for TPS by DHS in January 2010 following an environmental disaster that killed 200,000 people, with Redesignations and Renewals continuously made based upon sustained poor economic conditions and political and gang violence.
DHS Termination and Litigation
While the Biden administration had previously extended TPS Haiti through February 2026, immediately upon her confirmation in February 2025, Former DHS Secretary Noem vacated that extension, with a termination of TPS Haiti that was to take effect in August 2025.
Former Secretary Noem’s termination was then litigated and appealed in federal court for nearly a year. Two of those cases were consolidated into Mullin v. Doe, which was argued at the Supreme Court on April 29, 2026 and decided on June 25, 2026.
I-9 Review
An Employment Authorization Document (EAD) issued pursuant to a TPS application will bear category code A12 or C19. If such an EAD contains a photograph and remains valid, it qualifies as a List A document for I-9 purposes.
Nationals of Haiti may be legally in the US and authorized to work based on immigration pathways other than TPS. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Mullin will not affect employees whose status and work authorization are not related to TPS Haiti.
As TPS Haiti has been renewed and litigated extensively since 2010, I-9 documentation for employees who were authorized to work pursuant to TPS Haiti are likely complex and may require review by an experienced immigration attorney.
Key Takeaways for Employers
Based on the Supreme Court’s June 25, 2026 ruling in Mullin v. Doe, employers should carefully review I-9 documentation for any employee whose I-9 shows an expiration date of July 1, 2026.
For I-9s set to expire on July 1, employers should contact employees to request valid I-9 documents for reverification in order for employees to continue working as of July 2.
Best practice for employers who must reverify is to remind employees before the expiration date that they will need to present a List A or List C document to show continued employment authorization for reverification purposes. The employee must present these documents on or before the date their current employment authorization expires in order to continue working past their original I-9 expiration date.
The KMK Law Labor & Employment team is closely monitoring developments related to TPS Haiti and is available to assist employers with any I-9 compliance and immigration issues.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2026 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Of Counsel
Olivia Kues serves as Of Counsel in the Labor & Employment Group with a focus on immigration law. She represents clients across a broad range of industries, including healthcare, professional sports, information technology, and ...
Topics/Tags
Select- EEOC
- Labor & Employment Law
- Diversity
- National Enforcement Plan
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor
- Wage & Hour
- FMLA
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- FLSA
- Discrimination
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Sexual Harassment
- Coronavirus
- Social Media
- Sixth Circuit
- Title VII
- Employer Policies
- Holiday Policies
- Transgender Issues
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Employer Rules
- Overtime Pay
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Privacy
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Department of Justice
- Paid Leave Laws
- NLRA
- Compliance
- Supreme Court
- Tax Credit
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Workplace Accommodations
- Federal Trade Commission
- Litigation
- Worker Classification
- IRS
- Harassment
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- Retirement
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ADAAA
- ERISA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Whistleblower
- Disability
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Social Media Content
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Immigration
Recent Posts
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
- EEO-1 Reporting on the Chopping Block: What Employers Need to Know
- DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
- Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for Future Compliance
- New Requirements for Employers in California
- Back to the Office: The EEOC Clarifies the Limits of Telework Under the ADA
