Companies with employees who are work authorized pursuant to Temporary Protected Status (TPS) are facing an unusual compliance problem. The TPS designations for El Salvador (scheduled to end September 9, 2026) and for Sudan and Ukraine (scheduled to end October 19, 2026) have passed their expiration dates without a Federal Register notice either extending or terminating them.
Instead, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has posted webpage alerts stating that announcements on TPS for the affected countries will be made "at the appropriate time" and that, until then, beneficiaries “retain protection, including work authorization”.
While USCIS webpage alerts provide clarity on whether work is currently authorized, they do not provide employers with the documentation typically relied upon for I-9 compliance.
Overview
Ordinarily, a TPS extension is announced in the Federal Register, which may automatically extend existing Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) to a specific date or detail a plan for EAD renewal via application, and instruct employers on how to complete and update Forms I-9 for affected employees.
Employees working pursuant to their TPS El Salvador, Sudan, or Ukraine EADs now possess EADs and extension notices that appear expired on their face, and they may be asked by employers, landlords, or licensing agencies to provide official documentation that their status has been extended.
Employers face a two-sided risk. Terminating or suspending a TPS employee who remains authorized can expose the company to discrimination claims under the Immigration and Nationality Act’s anti-discrimination provisions, including claims of unfair documentary practices. Yet continuing employment without a clear documentary basis creates confusion in I-9 records.
Best Practices for Employers
Employers are encouraged to seek legal advice for any I-9 compliance concerns, but may consider the following:
- An employee should not be terminated solely because a TPS EAD looks expired. Current USCIS and E-Verify messaging states that Salvadoran, Sudanese, and Ukrainian TPS beneficiaries currently remain authorized to work.
- Dated copies of USCIS TPS webpage alerts and E-Verify updates should be saved and retained with affected Forms I-9.
- Federal Register and USCIS TPS webpages should be monitored closely for updates.
Conclusion
TPS work authorization issued without associated I-9 supporting documentation places additional burdens on employers: employers must ensure that authorized employees are allowed to work to avoid discrimination claims, while being left without the documentation typically issued by USCIS for I-9 compliance.
If you employ TPS beneficiaries from El Salvador, Sudan, or Ukraine, contact the immigration team at Keating Muething & Klekamp to review your Forms I-9 and set up a strategy to maintain I-9 compliance.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2026 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Of Counsel
Olivia Kues serves as Of Counsel in the Labor & Employment Group with a focus on immigration law. She represents clients across a broad range of industries, including healthcare, professional sports, information technology, and ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- EEOC
- Immigration
- Affirmative Action
- Compliance
- Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- Discrimination
- Labor Law
- FMLA
- Wage & Hour
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Coronavirus
- Diversity
- Social Media
- Reasonable Accommodation
- FLSA
- Sexual Harassment
- Employer Policies
- Title VII
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Transgender Issues
- Employer Rules
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Overtime Pay
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- National Enforcement Plan
- OSHA
- Privacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Holiday Policies
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Workplace Accommodations
- Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- Paid Leave Laws
- Litigation
- Tax Credit
- IRS
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Medical Marijuana
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Accommodation
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- ADAAA
- ERISA
- Race Discrimination
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Disability
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Authorization Without Documentation: Employers Left with I-9 Compliance Questions Following TPS Expirations for El Salvador, Sudan, and Ukraine
- EEOC Moves to Rescind 2012 Criminal Background Check Guidance
- EEOC Proposes Overhaul of Federal Workplace Discrimination Complaint Process
- OFCCP Publishes Final Rules Reducing Federal Contractor Affirmative Action Obligations
- US Court of Appeals puts $100,000 H-1B Fee on Hold Again
- Asking Is Protected: Sixth Circuit Expands FMLA Retaliation Protections
- New DHS Rule Will Restrict Student Periods of Admission from Duration of Status to Fixed End Date
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
