On July 22, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed down a decision in the case captioned Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce vs. Securities and Exchange Commission, which vacates new proxy access Rule 14a-11, and related amendments to Rule 14a-8 on shareholder proposals.
On May 25, 2011, over a month after its scheduled release date, the SEC adopted rules to implement Section 21F of the Exchange Act, "Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection," which was added by Section 922 of Dodd-Frank.
The SEC recently proposed rules to revise its definition of "Accredited Investor" so that it mirrors the definition adopted by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Under the proposed rules, a person is no longer permitted to include the value of his or her primary residence in determining whether they meet the $1 million net worth requirement for an Accredited Investor. The proposed rules do not define "primary residence," but do say that, for the most part, the common meaning of "the home where a person lives most of the time" should be used, whereas, in complex cases, the federal income tax rules should be consulted for guidance.
On January 25, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") adopted final "Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation and Golden Parachute Compensation" rules, which are effective for annual meetings of shareholders conducted on or after January 21, 2011. Also known as "Say-on-Pay," the final rules address three separate shareholder votes mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and several proxy disclosures surrounding these votes. Click here for our firm's complete advisory.
On October 27, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board met to further discuss the timeline for adoption of its Exposure Draft of a proposed Statement, Contingencies (Topic 450), Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies. For an overview of this Exposure Draft and the events leading up to its issuance, please see our previous blog on this subject.
On October 18, 2010, the SEC released proposed rules on "Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation and Golden Parachute Compensation" which address three separate shareholder votes mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act for annual meetings of shareholders conducted on or after January 21, 2011.
Yesterday, the SEC decided to stay the effectiveness of the proxy access rules pending resolution of a petition for review filed in connection with this lawsuit filed by the Business Rountable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce. As a result, proxy access will not take effect in 2010 and its potential applicability to the 2011 proxy season is in limbo.
The Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce have filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to invalidate the SEC’s recently-adopted proxy access rules.
This week, the SEC adoped final rules on proxy access which will require companies to provide certain shareholders or shareholder groups the opportunity to nominate candidates for boards of directors and to include information in the company's proxy materials about, and the ability to vote for, these shareholder nominees.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act immediately revised the net worth test for determining whether an individual investor is an “accredited investor” for purposes of Regulation D and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933. Specifically, as revised, prospective investors can no longer include the value of their primary residence for purposes of satisfying the $1 million net worth test. Historically, many investors have relied on the value of their homes for purposes of qualifying as an accredited investor. This immediately effective provision applies to offerings that are already in progress, including those that have had initial closings.
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Securities Regulation
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Law
- Clawback Rules
- Coronavirus
- IRS
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Government Shutdown
- Tax Planning
- SEC Enforcement
- Dodd-Frank
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- House Settlement
- NCAA
- NIL
- Sports
- Taxation
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Governance
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- Consumer Protection Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Tax
- Proxy Access Rules
- Economic Sanctions
- Securities Litigation
- Ohio LLC Act
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Wall Street Reform
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Compensation Committee Certification
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Tax Credit
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- Tokenized Stock Is Here: What Public Companies Need to Know About the SEC’s New “Innovation Exemption”
- (Almost) Around the Clock: What 23/5 Exchange Trading Means for Public Companies
- No More No-Action: SEC Permanently Discontinues Responses to Rule 14a-8 Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests
- SEC Moves to Formally Rescind Climate Disclosure Rules
- SEC Proposes Rules to Permit Optional Semiannual Reporting
- Proxy Season Update: SEC will not respond to Most Shareholder Proposal No-action Requests
- Reg FD Compliance Reminder – Influencer Interview Triggers 8-K Filing
- What Filers Should Know as Government Shutdown Looms
- Ninth Circuit Warning: Silence in the Face of SEC Comment Letters May Bolster Section 12(a)(2) Claims
- House Settlement Approved: College Sports Transition into a New but Familiar Legal Era