The Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce have filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to invalidate the SEC’s recently-adopted proxy access rules. The lawsuit focuses specifically on Exchange Act Rule 14a-11 and the SEC’s failure to properly consider the rule’s effects on “efficiency, competition and capital formation” and to “engage in evidence-based” rulemaking. The lawsuit alleges that the rules are arbitrary and capricious, violate the Administrative Procedure Act, violate companies' rights under the Constitution's 1st and 5th Amendments and will cost public companies “tens of millions of dollars.” The complaint requests a stay of the effective date and implementation of the final rules until the court has ruled on the lawsuit.
In a related press release, the U.S. Chamber’s Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness called the proxy access rules “special interest-driven” and voiced concern that proxy access “empowers unions and other special interests at the expense of the vast majority of retail shareholders.” The Business Rountable invoked the hot button political issues of the financial crisis and job creation, saying that proxy access will “exacerbate the short-term focus that is now seen as one of the root causes of the financial crisis” and “undermine a company’s ability to grow and create jobs.”
Predictably, the SEC responded publicly with a statement that it “believe[s] the proxy access rules are both lawful and in the best interests of the public and shareholders.” While the SEC also said it would “carefully consider and timely respond to the motion for a stay," we would be very surprised if the new rules are not here to stay.
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
Topics/Tags
Select- SEC
- Securities Regulation
- Securities Law
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Clawback Rules
- Nasdaq
- House Settlement
- NCAA
- NIL
- Sports
- Corporate Law
- IRS
- Coronavirus
- Tax Planning
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- SEC Enforcement
- Taxation
- Dodd-Frank
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Tax
- Corporate Governance
- FAST Act
- Consumer Protection Act
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- LIBOR
- Opportunity Zone
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Ninth Circuit Warning: Silence in the Face of SEC Comment Letters May Bolster Section 12(a)(2) Claims
- House Settlement Approved: College Sports Transition into a New but Familiar Legal Era
- Checking the Box(es): SEC Issues New Guidance Clarifying Clawback Expectations
- Pay vs. Performance and Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules: Will the SEC Retract Rulemaking?
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Eliminates Reporting Obligations for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Will Not Enforce the CTA Until Interim Rule is Effective
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Injunction Lifted - Corporate Transparency Act Back in Effect
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Says Reporting Obligations Remain On Hold
- Next Up in 2025: EDGAR Next
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Supreme Court Stays Nationwide Injunction – CTA Reporting Obligations Back in Effect