On November 17, 2025, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a statement regarding no action letter requests related to Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposals.
For the 2025-2026 proxy season, the SEC will not stand in the way of companies wanting to exclude shareholder proposals from their annual meetings except for proposals potentially excludable on state law grounds. The statement cited the large backlog of filings that accumulated during the government shutdown. The staff also cited the extensive body of guidance from the SEC on shareholder proposal questions:
“Due to current resource and timing considerations following the lengthy government shutdown and the large volume of registration statements and other filings requiring prompt staff attention, as well as the extensive body of guidance from the Commission and the staff available to both companies and proponents, the Division has determined to not respond to no-action requests for, and express no views on, companies’ intended reliance on any basis for exclusion of shareholder proposals under Rule 14a-8, other than no-action requests to exclude a proposal under Rule 14a-8(i)(1).”
The sole exception to the new policy are requests under Rule 14a-8(i)(1) which permits companies to exclude proposals that not proper subjects for action by shareholders under applicable state law. Chairman Atkins has stated that there may be no fundamental right under Delaware law for a company’s shareholders to vote on precatory proposals.
The statement also provides an alternative for companies that still want to receive a response to their notification that they intend to exclude a proposal from an annual meeting on a basis other than Rule 14a-8(i)(1). Companies must still notify the commission and proponents no later than 80 calendar days before filing their definitive proxy statement if they intend to exclude a shareholder proposal. Companies must include in their submissions an unqualified representation that the company has a reasonable basis to exclude the proposal based on the provisions of Rule 14a-8, prior published guidance, and/or judicial decisions.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
- Associate
Chris Colloton is an associate in the firm's Business Representation & Transactions Group, focusing his practice in the areas of securities, mergers and acquisitions, and business planning.
Chris earned his law degree from the ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Government Shutdown
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Clawback Rules
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Law
- Coronavirus
- IRS
- Tax Planning
- House Settlement
- NCAA
- NIL
- Sports
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- SEC Enforcement
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- Dodd-Frank
- Taxation
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Tax
- FAST Act
- Consumer Protection Act
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Wall Street Reform
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Social Media
- Marketing
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Tax Credit
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- SEC
- Securities Law
- Securities Regulation
Recent Posts
- Proxy Season Update: SEC will not respond to Most Shareholder Proposal No-action Requests
- Reg FD Compliance Reminder – Influencer Interview Triggers 8-K Filing
- What Filers Should Know as Government Shutdown Looms
- Ninth Circuit Warning: Silence in the Face of SEC Comment Letters May Bolster Section 12(a)(2) Claims
- House Settlement Approved: College Sports Transition into a New but Familiar Legal Era
- Checking the Box(es): SEC Issues New Guidance Clarifying Clawback Expectations
- Pay vs. Performance and Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules: Will the SEC Retract Rulemaking?
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Eliminates Reporting Obligations for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Will Not Enforce the CTA Until Interim Rule is Effective
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: Injunction Lifted - Corporate Transparency Act Back in Effect


