M&A practitioners must take into account the events surrounding the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the accompanying international unrest when contemplating a proposed transaction. These events will impact M&A transactions both in the short term and the long term. With the situation unfolding and changing day to day, potential buyers and sellers should consult counsel on how the Russia and Ukraine escalation will affect their business today, and how it may affect their business operations going forward. Below is a summary of topics to consider.
This post is a follow-up to January’s cybersecurity post discussing the cybersecurity considerations in performing due diligence in M&A transactions. The previous discussion can be found here. This post addresses two contractual provisions, the closing conditions and indemnification, which, if properly utilized, can protect acquiring companies from taking on too much cybersecurity risk in M&A transactions.
In today’s M&A transactions, cybersecurity deficiencies in a target company pose potentially significant financial and regulatory risks to the acquiring company. For this reason, new measures must be implemented in M&A transactions to protect both companies from today’s emerging cybersecurity epidemic.
Topics/Tags
Select- SEC
- Securities Law
- Securities Regulation
- Corporate Transparency Act
- IRS
- Tax Planning
- Taxation
- Corporate Law
- Nasdaq
- Coronavirus
- Clawback Rules
- SEC Enforcement
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Dodd-Frank
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Corporate Tax
- JOBS Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Cryptocurrency
- Conflict Minerals
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Private Offerings
- Whistleblower
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- LIBOR
- Opportunity Zone
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Online Trading Platforms
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Wall Street Reform
- Annual Reports
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Marketing
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional
- SEC Climate Rule Vote Scheduled for March 6, 2024
- Limited Partners’ Tax Savings from Self-Employment Taxes are under Scrutiny
- FinCEN Extends the Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Deadline for Newly Created Entities
- SEC Postpones Share Repurchase Modernization Disclosure Rules
- Effective Date of SEC Clawback Rule Finally In Sight
- SEC Sued Over Newly Adopted Share Repurchase Rules
- SEC Extends Period to Act on Exchange Clawback Rules
- SEC Charges Public Company for Misleading Non-GAAP Disclosures
- NYSE and Nasdaq Propose Clawback Listing Standards: What You Need to Know