Planning & Zoning in Kentucky – Bring Your “A” Game to the Administrative Hearing

Sophia R. Holley

A key piece of our American legal system is due process, and the right to have your “day in court.” For planning and zoning appeals, that day in court will likely come before you arrive at the circuit court. This is due to the deference provided to administrative bodies in their planning and land use decisions.

In Kentucky, circuit court review of the zoning decisions of legislative bodies is specifically authorized by the Kentucky Revised Statutes. Judicial review of administrative action by such bodies is ultimately concerned with the question of arbitrariness. An administrative ruling is arbitrary, and therefore clearly erroneous, if it is not supported by substantial evidence. With respect to the factual determinations of the administrative body, the facts will be generally upheld even though there exists evidence to the contrary in the record. 

The Supreme Court of Kentucky has clarified that a court cannot substitute its judgment on contested issues of fact. See Kentucky Retirement Systems v. Ashcraft, 559 S.W.3d 812, 820 (Ky. 2018). Instead, the court must consider if the appealing party’s proof was so compelling that no reasonable person could have failed to be persuaded, and that the zoning decision was therefore arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion. While this is not an undefeatable bar, it highlights the importance of the evidence before the legislative body making the zoning decision.

For this reason, a party seeking zoning relief, or opposing it, benefits from presenting its best case before the legislative body. This includes hiring experts where necessary, identifying all arguments, and securing counsel to help in advocating your position. The time and energy you invest at the beginning of the administrative process is time well invested. If legal counsel is hired after the administrative hearing has occurred, it is possible that positions and arguments will be waived by the time the matter makes it to the circuit court of the county in which the property is located.

By the way, this principle absolutely applies in Ohio, too. If you are a property owner with an interest in a zoning or land use decision, it behooves you to present your experts, evidence, and arguments at the administrative level. It may also benefit you to utilize an attorney, as attorneys are often provided rights in administrative hearings not afforded to non-attorneys (for example, the right to cross examine witnesses).

Should you have any questions or need assistance, please contact Sophia Holley.

Sophia R. Holley

KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.


© 2024 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved


Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Functional cookies collect information about your choices and preferences, and collect information about your use of the Sites and Services which enable us to improve functionality.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.