Last week, President Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Labor, former Oregon Congresswoman Lori Chávez-DeRemer, appeared before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions for her confirmation hearing. Her nomination was something of a surprise as Chávez-DeRemer, the daughter of a lifelong Teamster, was known for taking more union-leaning stances during her short stint in Congress. For example, as a member of the House, Chávez-DeRemer was one of three Republicans to support the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act. The PRO Act sought to expand labor protections and weaken “right-to-work” laws, which allow employees to opt-out of participation in or paying dues to unions that represent workers at their place of employment.
During the hearing, Chávez-DeRemer seemed to downplay some of her previous stances and expressed her willingness to adhere to President Trump’s labor agenda. Indicating that her previous positions were a reflection on her commitments to her constituents in Oregon, she committed herself to President Trump’s policy vision when pressed about her support of the more union-leaning stances the Department of Labor took during the Biden Administration. Although maintaining some support for the PRO Act, Chávez-DeRemer clarified that she would not support the Act when in conflict with right-to-work laws. Throughout the hearing, it became clear that Chávez-DeRemer’s stance on labor issues will reflect the goals of the Trump Administration.
What does this mean for employers? As this blog has previously covered, agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have already been actively rescinding guidance issued during the Biden Administration regarding topics such as the enforceability of non-compete agreements and specific protections for LGBTQ+ workers. Should Chávez-DeRemer be confirmed, employers can expect her to continue carrying out the current administration’s labor agenda. Under Chávez-DeRemer’s leadership, the DOL will likely focus on establishing guidance pertaining to the independent contractor classification rule and exploring strategies to modernize federal labor laws to aid business growth and workforce development. Nevertheless, her nomination suggests a potential evolution from the first Trump administration’s attitude towards union issues.
Given the pace already set by the Trump Administration, employers should expect continued development in federal interpretation of labor and employment law. How Chávez-DeRemer’s priorities fit within those interpretations remains to be seen. However, the KMK Labor & Employment team will continue to monitor new developments and is ready to assist employers as they navigate the changing labor landscape.
Update: On March 10, 2025, the Senate confirmed Lori Chávez-DeRemer as the Secretary of Labor in a bipartisan vote. As discussed in this blog, employers can expect Chávez-DeRemer to implement the Trump Administration’s policy agenda: leveling opportunities for businesses, unions, and workers. Although Chávez-DeRemer’s confirmation has been met with significant support from labor union organizations, employers should expect the Department of Labor to begin issuing guidance aligning with the Trump administration’s interpretation of federal labor and employment law in the coming weeks. The KMK Labor & Employment team will continue to monitor developments from the DOL under Chávez-DeRemer and is available to assist employers in navigating the changing labor landscape.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Greg Robinson assists his clients in navigating the complex world of workplace laws and regulations. He has counseled clients on a wide array of employment matters, including wage and hour disputes, discrimination charges ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 2024. While in law ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Religion Discrimination
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Rules
- Labor Law
- Discrimination
- Wage & Hour
- EEOC
- Coronavirus
- Department of Labor
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- NLRB
- Artificial Intelligence
- Title VII
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Worker Classification
- Compliance
- FLSA
- Department of Justice
- National Labor Relations Board
- Supreme Court
- Harassment
- NLRA
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Diversity
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Overtime Pay
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- Whistleblower
- Federal Arbitration Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Ohio “Mini-WARN” Act Now In Effect: Key Compliance Takeaways for Employers
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price
- One Tweet Away From Trouble: Social Media at Work
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims

