The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has eliminated any remaining uncertainty about its 2026 enforcement priorities regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. In a December 18, 2025 interview with Reuters, EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas emphasized the EEOC’s position that workplace initiatives using race, sex, or other protected characteristics as “motivating factors” in employment decisions are unlawful under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Chair Lucas also clearly signaled that employers maintaining such initiatives can expect to be subject to investigations, enforcement actions, and litigation throughout 2026. This announcement is in furtherance of executive orders issued by President Trump and guidance released by the EEOC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2025, which effectively outlawed the majority of DEI programs.
During the interview, Chair Lucas stated that the EEOC will focus enforcement efforts on “race-restricted programs or sex-restricted programs or other actions that involve overt distinctions between people based on race.” The Chair further cautioned employers against hiding behind using rebranded terminology to avoid the EEOC’s scrutiny, stating: “It doesn’t matter if you call [it] DEI or belonging or ‘EO’ or anything: If it functions like that, it’s illegal.”
Consistent with that position, Chair Lucas announced that the EEOC intends to expand its enforcement efforts, including by reviewing archived web content to identify employers who have merely changed external DEI-related messaging without modifying internal practices. The EEOC will scrutinize programs involving employee resource groups, recruitment and hiring initiatives, and other employment-related decisions. The stated goal of these enforcement efforts is to “to shift to a conservative view of civil rights.”
Additionally, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration has launched investigations into the use of diversity initiatives in hiring and promotion at major U.S. companies, including one multinational technology company and another telecommunications conglomerate. Based on the report, the DOJ issued document demands seeking information about workplace programs under the False Claims Act, a federal statute that allows the government to recover funds lost due to fraud.
Finally, Chair Lucas recently publicized the Trump Administration’s position on social media. In a recent video posted on X, she encouraged white male employees who believe they have been subject to discrimination to file complaints with the EEOC. In the post, she states: "Are you a white male who has experienced discrimination at work based on your race or sex? You may have a claim to recover money under federal civil rights laws. Contact the EEOC as soon as possible.” This appeal foreshadows the EEOC’s plan to pursue claims of “reverse discrimination” from members of “majority groups” resulting from illegal DEI programs.
KMK will continue to monitor enforcement developments closely. The KMK Labor and Employment group advises employers on DEI compliance and regularly represents employers in EEOC investigations and related litigation.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2026 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Alison practices in the firm’s Labor & Employment Group, where she assists clients in all stages of workplace disputes. Alison has extensive experience counseling clients regarding hiring and firing issues, disciplinary ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the Donald P. Klekamp College of Law at the University of Cincinnati in ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- Wage & Hour
- FMLA
- FLSA
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- EEOC
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Sexual Harassment
- Sixth Circuit
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Discrimination
- Social Media
- Coronavirus
- Title VII
- Transgender Issues
- Employer Policies
- Religion Discrimination
- Diversity
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Rules
- Overtime Pay
- Workplace Violence
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Telework
- OSHA
- Artificial Intelligence
- Paid Leave Laws
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Privacy
- Department of Justice
- Tax Credit
- Compliance
- NLRA
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Supreme Court
- Workplace Accommodations
- Federal Trade Commission
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Litigation
- IRS
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Whistleblower
- Disability
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
- Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for Future Compliance
- New Requirements for Employers in California
- Back to the Office: The EEOC Clarifies the Limits of Telework Under the ADA
- EEOC Rescinds Anti-Harassment Guidance Addressing Transgender Protections
- The EEOC’s Renewed Focus on Employer DEI Programs in 2026
- The Commute Counts: DOL Confirms FMLA Leave Extends to Travel Time
- Expansion of State Paid Leave Laws in 2026

