On May 20, 2025, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) updated its Site-Specific Targeting (SST) inspection program. The SST inspection program is OSHA’s primary planned inspection initiative for non-construction workplaces with 20 or more employees. The updates are expected to increase on-site inspections in highly regulated sectors, such as warehousing, transportation, distribution, and healthcare. For non-construction workplaces, this update marks a significant shift in how OSHA prioritizes enforcement, relying more heavily on employer-reported injury and illness data or the lack thereof.
Under the updated SST program, OSHA will utilize Form 300A data from calendar years 2021-2023 to identify workplaces for inspection based on:
- High injury and illness rates from 2023 data;
- Upwardly trending injury and illness rates based on 2021-2023 data at or above twice the 2022 private sector average;
- Injury and illness rates markedly below industry averages; and
- Failure to submit an OSHA Form 300A in 2023.
Employer “Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred” (“DART”) rates will be a key metric utilized by OSHA when identifying employers for inspection. The DART rate is a calculation of the severity of injuries and illnesses that affect an employee’s ability to work. Industries with DART rates significantly above the private industry average should expect to be the focus of additional OSHA inspections.
With increased inspections, employers should also be mindful that OSHA inspections tend to go far beyond their initial scope. Although an inspector may arrive at a workplace due to high injury rates, the inspector may leave the establishment after also issuing citations for unrelated safety violations. Even if the employer-submitted data appears accurate and compliant, other areas of non-compliance may come to light during an inspection. Avoiding the inspection through accurate record keeping and diligent reporting is the first line of defense.
Key Takeaways for Employers
Employers in high risk industries should expect more frequent inspections in the future. Even if an employer has complied with all reporting requirements, OSHA may identify it for an inspection because of the employer’s DART rate. Taking proactive safety measures and hazard-specific interventions based on past data will reduce the likelihood of unwanted OSHA citations during the inspection. The KMK Labor and Employment team is ready to provide advice and counsel regarding the steps you should take to ensure compliance with workplace safety regulations.
- Partner
Chris Jones focuses his practice on litigating and advising clients regarding issues within the workplace. Chris strives to fully understand clients’ business concerns and counsels clients regarding hiring and firing issues ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 2024. While in law ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Wage & Hour
- Artificial Intelligence
- Labor Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Department of Labor
- Coronavirus
- NLRB
- Harassment
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Title VII
- Compliance
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Religion Discrimination
- FLSA
- Department of Justice
- Supreme Court
- NLRA
- National Labor Relations Board
- Privacy
- Diversity
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Arbitration
- Federal Trade Commission
- FMLA
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Accommodations
- Overtime Pay
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Social Media
- Medical Marijuana
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Whistleblower
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis