On May 20, 2025, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) updated its Site-Specific Targeting (SST) inspection program. The SST inspection program is OSHA’s primary planned inspection initiative for non-construction workplaces with 20 or more employees. The updates are expected to increase on-site inspections in highly regulated sectors, such as warehousing, transportation, distribution, and healthcare. For non-construction workplaces, this update marks a significant shift in how OSHA prioritizes enforcement, relying more heavily on employer-reported injury and illness data or the lack thereof.
Under the updated SST program, OSHA will utilize Form 300A data from calendar years 2021-2023 to identify workplaces for inspection based on:
- High injury and illness rates from 2023 data;
- Upwardly trending injury and illness rates based on 2021-2023 data at or above twice the 2022 private sector average;
- Injury and illness rates markedly below industry averages; and
- Failure to submit an OSHA Form 300A in 2023.
Employer “Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred” (“DART”) rates will be a key metric utilized by OSHA when identifying employers for inspection. The DART rate is a calculation of the severity of injuries and illnesses that affect an employee’s ability to work. Industries with DART rates significantly above the private industry average should expect to be the focus of additional OSHA inspections.
With increased inspections, employers should also be mindful that OSHA inspections tend to go far beyond their initial scope. Although an inspector may arrive at a workplace due to high injury rates, the inspector may leave the establishment after also issuing citations for unrelated safety violations. Even if the employer-submitted data appears accurate and compliant, other areas of non-compliance may come to light during an inspection. Avoiding the inspection through accurate record keeping and diligent reporting is the first line of defense.
Key Takeaways for Employers
Employers in high risk industries should expect more frequent inspections in the future. Even if an employer has complied with all reporting requirements, OSHA may identify it for an inspection because of the employer’s DART rate. Taking proactive safety measures and hazard-specific interventions based on past data will reduce the likelihood of unwanted OSHA citations during the inspection. The KMK Labor and Employment team is ready to provide advice and counsel regarding the steps you should take to ensure compliance with workplace safety regulations.
- Partner
Chris Jones focuses his practice on litigating and advising clients regarding issues within the workplace. Chris strives to fully understand clients’ business concerns and counsels clients regarding hiring and firing issues ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the Donald P. Klekamp College of Law at the University of Cincinnati in ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Arbitration
- NLRB
- National Labor Relations Board
- Sexual Harassment
- EEOC
- Department of Labor
- Sixth Circuit
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Discrimination
- FMLA
- FLSA
- Social Media
- Transgender Issues
- Coronavirus
- Title VII
- Employer Policies
- Diversity
- Religion Discrimination
- Wage & Hour
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Rules
- Overtime Pay
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Workplace Violence
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Non-Compete Agreements
- OSHA
- Artificial Intelligence
- Paid Leave Laws
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Privacy
- Tax Credit
- Department of Justice
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Compliance
- NLRA
- Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Litigation
- IRS
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Securities Law
- Privacy Laws
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
- Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for Future Compliance
- New Requirements for Employers in California
- Back to the Office: The EEOC Clarifies the Limits of Telework Under the ADA
- EEOC Rescinds Anti-Harassment Guidance Addressing Transgender Protections
- The EEOC’s Renewed Focus on Employer DEI Programs in 2026
- The Commute Counts: DOL Confirms FMLA Leave Extends to Travel Time
- Expansion of State Paid Leave Laws in 2026
- Work Opportunity Tax Credit At Risk: Use It Before You Lose It

