Social media has become an unavoidable part of society and an unavoidable issue in the workplace. While online posts may seem personal, a single tweet, post, or comment can quickly escalate into a workplace issue. With more than 70% of Americans active on at least one social media platform, employers should ensure their social media policies are carefully drafted to protect business interests while preserving employee rights.
Well-drafted policies can provide both protection for the business and clarity for employees. This safeguards the company’s brand and legal interests while setting clear expectations for online conduct. However, these policies must be created carefully. Overly broad restrictions invite scrutiny from regulators and risk being struck down, while insufficient guardrails may leave employers without recourse when employee conduct crosses the line.
Legal Boundaries: What Employers Cannot Do
In crafting social media policies, employers must remain mindful of legal limits. For instance, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), protects employees’ rights to engage in “concerted activity,” which includes discussing wages, schedules, or other terms and conditions of employment, even on social media. Policies that categorically prohibit employees from mentioning workplace matters risk violating federal law. Indeed, federal agencies have consistently determined that overbroad policies can unlawfully restrict protected employee activity.
Moreover, numerous states have enacted social media privacy laws. In many instances, these laws prohibit employers from accessing an employee’s private social media posts, and thus, effectively preclude employers from disciplining employees for non-public posts. Employers should be mindful that state and local laws may impact their ability to access and discipline employees based on private posts.
Practical Considerations: What Employers Should Do
Social media policies should be designed to withstand legal scrutiny and provide employers with practical tools to address conduct that threatens workplace harmony or the company’s reputation. A well-drafted policy can give employers discretion to discipline employees when online activity crosses the line, while still respecting federally protected rights.
When establishing or reviewing a social media policy, employers should focus on five key points:
- Avoid Overbreadth: Policies that categorically prohibit employees from posting about their workplace are often found unlawful. Instead, restrictions should be limited to prohibit conduct such as threats, harassment, or the disclosure of confidential business information.
- Clarify Use During Work Hours: Employers may reasonably restrict personal social media use during work hours, especially on company devices or networks. Employers should also caution employees against using company email addresses for personal accounts.
- Encourage Professionalism and Decorum: Employers should remind employees that discriminatory, harassing, or offensive posts, even those made outside of work hours, can create legal and reputational risks. Posts targeting protected characteristics such as race, religion, gender (including gender identity), and sexual orientation can expose both the employee and employer to liability.
- Tie to Existing Conduct Policies: Social media activity policies should be closely tied to the company’s existing code of conduct and anti-discrimination/harassment policies. Making this connection explicit reinforces that employees are held to the same standards online as in the workplace.
- Prohibit Misrepresentation: Employees should be instructed not to speak on behalf of the company unless authorized to do so. Requiring disclaimers such as “opinions are my own” can help minimize confusion.
Ultimately, employers face a delicate balance in shaping social media policies. When carefully drafted, a social media policy can minimize risk, preserve workplace culture, and provide clarity for employees navigating an increasingly digital environment. The KMK Labor & Employment team is available to assist with drafting, reviewing, and updating social media policies, as well as providing training and guidance to ensure compliance with legal standards.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Chris Jones focuses his practice on litigating and advising clients regarding issues within the workplace. Chris strives to fully understand clients’ business concerns and counsels clients regarding hiring and firing issues ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 2024. While in law ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Religion Discrimination
- Employment Law
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Rules
- Labor Law
- Discrimination
- Wage & Hour
- EEOC
- Department of Labor
- Coronavirus
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- NLRB
- Artificial Intelligence
- Title VII
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Worker Classification
- Compliance
- FLSA
- Department of Justice
- National Labor Relations Board
- Harassment
- Supreme Court
- NLRA
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Diversity
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Overtime Pay
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price
- One Tweet Away From Trouble: Social Media at Work
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision

