On October 13, 2022, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to modify Wage and Hour Division regulations to revise its analysis for determining employee or independent contractor classification under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Over the past decades, the DOL and courts have applied an economic reality test to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the FLSA. Although factors examined under this test varied across circuits, the ultimate question under this analysis is whether, as a matter of economic reality, the worker is either economically dependent on the employer for work (and is thus an employee) or is in business for him/herself (and is thus an independent contractor). In January 2021, the DOL reduced the primary factors the agency would consider when determining whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee to two “core factors”, namely, the nature and degree of control over the work and the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on investment. These two factors under the 2021 rule are the most probative and carry greater weight in the analysis.
The DOL seeks to modify the 2021 “core factors” inquiry under the economic reality test analysis, and instead return to the totality-of-the-circumstances analysis of multiple factors in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the FLSA. These factors generally include the opportunity for profit or loss, investment, the degree of permanence of the work relationship, the degree of control by the employer over the worker, whether the work is an integral part of the employer’s business, and the worker’s use of skill and initiative.
The proposed rule will likely tip the scale in favor of classifying more workers as employees, as compared to the current rule. Employers who use independent contractors should carefully analyze the relationship with these workers in light of the six factors in the proposed rule. Workers who are currently classified as independent contractors under the current rule may be misclassified under the proposed rule. Misclassification of workers carries significant risks for employers. If a change to a worker’s classification brings the worker under FLSA’ s protection, an employer could face liability for unpaid wages and overtime, and liquidated damages equal to the amount owed in unpaid wages. Treble damages, which is an amount equal to two times the unpaid wages are possible too. In addition, attorney’s fees and costs may be awarded. Furthermore, misclassification carries other risks, including tax and benefits liabilities, and tort liability to third parties for injuries caused by contractors, if those workers were incorrectly classified.
The DOL has invited interested parties to submit comments regarding the NPRM by December 13, 2022 (the new deadline). For more information, please contact the KMK Law Labor & Employment Law team.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2026 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- EEOC
- Employment Law
- Diversity
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor
- Wage & Hour
- Immigration
- National Enforcement Plan
- FMLA
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- FLSA
- Discrimination
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Coronavirus
- Sexual Harassment
- Social Media
- Sixth Circuit
- Title VII
- Employer Policies
- Holiday Policies
- Transgender Issues
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Employer Rules
- Overtime Pay
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Artificial Intelligence
- Privacy
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- Paid Leave Laws
- Compliance
- Supreme Court
- Tax Credit
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Workplace Accommodations
- Federal Trade Commission
- Litigation
- Worker Classification
- IRS
- Harassment
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- Retirement
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ADAAA
- ERISA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Whistleblower
- Disability
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
- EEO-1 Reporting on the Chopping Block: What Employers Need to Know
- DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
- Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for Future Compliance
- New Requirements for Employers in California
- Back to the Office: The EEOC Clarifies the Limits of Telework Under the ADA