As we previously reported, in April 2024 the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued its final regulations implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). Among other things, the rule stated that employers may be required to accommodate employees for abortion, treating it as a pregnancy-related condition.
That provision quickly became controversial. Several members of Congress and more conservative members of the EEOC argued that the rule went beyond what the PWFA allows, especially by including elective abortion in the scope of required workplace accommodations. The regulation was challenged in court, and now a federal judge in the Western District of Louisiana has partially struck it down.
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge David Joseph found that the EEOC overstepped its authority. The court applied the "major questions doctrine"—a legal principle that prevents federal agencies from making sweeping policy decisions without clear direction from Congress. Given the ongoing political and legal debate around abortion—especially after the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade—the court found that Congress likely did not intend to delegate such a significant policy call to the EEOC.
The court noted that the PWFA was passed just six months after Dobbs. If Congress had wanted to require accommodations for abortion, the judge reasoned, it would have said so explicitly. As a result, the court vacated the part of the EEOC regulation that treated elective abortion as a condition requiring accommodation under the PWFA.
What This Means for Employers
For HR professionals, this decision provides immediate clarity: under current law, employers are not required to provide workplace accommodations for elective abortions under the PWFA. However, this may not be the final word. Andrea Lucas, the current acting chair of the EEOC (and a dissenting voice on the original regulation), has signaled that she may propose revisions to the rule. Any changes would need to go through the formal rulemaking process, which includes public notice and comment.
In the meantime, HR teams should:
- Continue to comply with all PWFA requirements related to pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions—excluding elective abortion for now.
- Monitor developments from the EEOC, particularly any efforts to revise the rule.
- Consult legal counsel when navigating requests for accommodations that may raise legal or political sensitivities.
As always, clear policies, training for managers, and a consistent approach to handling accommodation requests will help ensure compliance and minimize risk. The members of the KMK Labor & Employment Team are available to assist with any questions you may have regarding compliance with the PWFA.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Greg Robinson assists his clients in navigating the complex world of workplace laws and regulations. He has counseled clients on a wide array of employment matters, including wage and hour disputes, discrimination charges ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- OSHA
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Title VII
- Supreme Court
- NLRB
- Coronavirus
- Workplace Violence
- FLSA
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Compliance
- Religion Discrimination
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Diversity
- National Labor Relations Board
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Federal Trade Commission
- Overtime Pay
- Arbitration
- Artificial Intelligence
- FMLA
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employment Litigation
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Unions
- Whistleblower
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- United States Supreme Court
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- Privacy Laws
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis
- The Independent Contractor Tug-of-War: Navigating the Latest DOL Shifts
- ICE Raids and Audits – What’s an Employer to Do
- New Online Registration Requirements for Foreign Nationals
- Workplace Violence: Are You Taking Required Steps to Protect Your Employees?