In November 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) released a new technical assistance document titled “Discrimination Against American Workers Is Against the Law” and updated its webpage on the topic. The new materials underscore the EEOC’s position that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects all workers from discriminatory conduct including American workers. Further, the new release is consistent with the recent focus on perceived anti-American bias.
In the release, the EEOC identifies several high-risk areas for potential violations. Job postings that express preferences for specific national origins or visa holders—for example, “H-1B preferred”—are unlawful. Likewise, disparate treatment in hiring, promotion, or application processes that makes it harder for U.S. workers to access opportunities may constitute discrimination. The materials also highlight pay disparities between visa workers and similarly situated American employees, harassment based on national origin, and retaliation against individuals who report discrimination as key enforcement priorities. The EEOC stresses that Title VII prohibits both unfavorable and favorable treatment based on national origin, including preferences for foreign workers.
The guidance further clarifies that Title VII’s protections apply across all terms and conditions of employment, including hiring, firing, job assignments, training, benefits, and layoffs. The EEOC warns that common employer justifications—such as assumptions about superior productivity, stereotypes about work ethic, or the desire to cut labor costs through lower wages—cannot be used to defend discriminatory practices. Illegal treatment may also arise from improper reliance on immigration-related processes, including the misuse of visa wage structures or informal pay arrangements.
Given the heightened scrutiny, employers are encouraged to review and update their policies, recruiting practices, compensation systems, and workplace conduct standards to ensure they do not favor workers of particular national origins or visa statuses. Organizations may also benefit from training hiring managers on nondiscriminatory practices, auditing decisions for disparate treatment indicators, and documenting objective, job-related criteria. The KMK Labor and Employment team will continue monitor developments, including any forthcoming EEOC guidance or enforcement activity, and is prepared to assist employers.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Chris Jones focuses his practice on litigating and advising clients regarding issues within the workplace. Chris strives to fully understand clients’ business concerns and counsels clients regarding hiring and firing issues ...
- Associate
Kelzé Riley is an associate in the firm's Labor & Employment Group. Her practice includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
Kelzé earned her J.D. from the University of Cincinnati College of Law in 2024. While in law ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Title VII
- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Religion Discrimination
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Labor Law
- Employer Rules
- Wage & Hour
- Coronavirus
- Department of Labor
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- NLRB
- Artificial Intelligence
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Workplace Violence
- OSHA
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Compliance
- FLSA
- Worker Classification
- Department of Justice
- National Labor Relations Board
- Supreme Court
- Privacy
- NLRA
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Harassment
- Diversity
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Overtime Pay
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Litigation
- IRS
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- Whistleblower
- Federal Arbitration Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- EEOC Takes Aim at Perceived Anti-American Bias
- Ohio “Mini-WARN” Act Now In Effect: Key Compliance Takeaways for Employers
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price
- One Tweet Away From Trouble: Social Media at Work
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect

