The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) push to invalidate non-compete agreements for millions of workers gained steam today, courtesy of a ruling out of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As noted by this blog, in April of 2024 the FTC announced a final Rule largely invalidating non-compete agreements across the country. In the aftermath of that announcement multiple lawsuits were filed against the FTC, seeking to enjoin enforcement of this Rule.
Earlier this month, opponents of the FTC’s Rule were offered a glimmer of hope when the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted an injunction in Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Commission. The relief provided by that Court, however, was limited, as the ruling only enjoined the FTC from enforcing the Rule against the specific plaintiff in that case. Following that ruling, attention turned to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, which was set to rule on an injunction request sought in ATS Tree Services, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission. Opponents to the FTC’s Rule hoped the Court there might provide broader relief.
In a decision handed down today, however, Judge Kelley Brisbon Hodge denied the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction. The Court found that ATS Tree Services failed to establish it would suffer irreparable harm were the rule to go into effect, a finding that by itself would warrant denying the requested injunction. The Court, however, went further, finding that even had the plaintiff established irreparable harm, its request would still be denied as it was unable to demonstrate that it was likely to prevail on its claim that the FTC’s Rule was unlawful. Rather, the Court found that the FTC was likely acting within its authority when issuing the Rule.
As of today, the FTC’s Rule is set to go into effect on September 4, 2024. There is still, of course, a long time between now and then. There have been other lawsuits filed challenging the legality of the FTC’s Rule, and other courts will have their chance to weigh in on this issue. This blog will be sure to keep you updated on any new developments, and if you have any questions please contact a member of our Labor and Employment team.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2026 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Greg Robinson assists his clients in navigating the complex world of workplace laws and regulations. He has counseled clients on a wide array of employment matters, including wage and hour disputes, discrimination charges ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- EEOC
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Diversity
- Department of Labor
- Wage & Hour
- NLRB
- FMLA
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Discrimination
- FLSA
- Immigration
- Coronavirus
- National Enforcement Plan
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Sexual Harassment
- Social Media
- Sixth Circuit
- Title VII
- Employer Policies
- Transgender Issues
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Employer Rules
- Holiday Policies
- Overtime Pay
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Artificial Intelligence
- Privacy
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- Compliance
- Paid Leave Laws
- Supreme Court
- Tax Credit
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Federal Trade Commission
- Litigation
- IRS
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ADAAA
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Disability
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
- EEO-1 Reporting on the Chopping Block: What Employers Need to Know
- DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
- Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for Future Compliance
- New Requirements for Employers in California
- Back to the Office: The EEOC Clarifies the Limits of Telework Under the ADA
