Between COVID-19 and social unrest, this year has seen many reservists and other members of the military called to active duty. Unfortunately, military leave seems to be an issue with which even sophisticated employers struggle. While not an exhaustive list, here are five things for employers to bear in mind about military leave.
- USERRA is extremely broad. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), which protects civilian employment of military personnel, is very broad. Unlike most employment laws, it applies to almost all employers regardless of size and almost all employees regardless of classification or status. If you have employees in the military, it is a generally safe assumption that they are covered by USERRA. In addition, USERRA protects employees from discrimination for past military service, current military obligations, or an intent to serve. As a result, even those employees who have merely indicated an intent to join the military are protected.
- Employees returning from leave must be given an “escalator position.” When an employee returns from a USERRA covered leave he or she is entitled to re-employment in the position the employee would have occupied with reasonable certainty as if the employee had remained continuously employed. For example, consider an employee who is hired into a position, e.g. Production Level 1. Every employee is promoted to the next level, e.g. Production Level 2, after six months. If the employee goes on leave after three months of employment and returns four months later, the employee needs to be reinstated into a Production Level 2 position because that is the position the employee would have had if he or she had been employed with the company the entire time. However, if the employee’s job was eliminated or there was a company wide pay cut, the employee may suffer those consequences upon return. The escalator goes up and down.
- Employees returning from leave are protected from discharge. A reemployed employee may not be discharged without cause for one year after the date of reemployment if the person’s period of military service was for 181 days or more or for 180 days after the date of reemployment if the person’s period of military service was for 31 to 180 days. As noted, employees are also protected from discrimination for their military service and from retaliation for exercising their rights under USERRA.
- USERRA trumps company policies. USERRA has very limited requirements for employees before going on leave - they can provide oral or written notice if possible but are not required to provide documentation such as orders. Upon return, employers have more leeway to request documentation depending on the length of the leave. However, the requirements spelled out in USERRA govern what is permissible and employers’ policies on matters such as leave documentation and notice requirements, reinstatement to employment and reapplication processes do not override USERRA’s requirements and cannot be imposed over and above them.
- USERRA litigation is always high risk. People who serve in the military are highly respected in our society and rightly so. This means that anyone who brings a USERRA claim is going to be sympathetic to a jury. Moreover, USERRA issues most frequently arise in areas with a heavy military presence, meaning that any jury pool is likely to be full of individuals with military connections, familial or otherwise. The offshoot is that USERRA litigation is inherently risky for employers. The best approach is to make sure that any USERRA issues are handled properly and avoid litigation.
For assistance with military leave issues, contact any member of our Labor & Employment Group.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2024 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Employment Law
- Coronavirus
- Labor Law
- Federal Trade Commission
- Department of Labor
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- NLRB
- Workplace Accommodations
- FMLA
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Employment Litigation
- Arbitration
- Workplace Violence
- Discrimination
- Religion Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- FLSA
- IRS
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Race Discrimination
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Accommodation
- OSHA
- Whistleblower
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- United States Supreme Court
- EEOC
- ADAAA
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Unions
- Title VII
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- NLRA
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Securities Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Privacy Laws
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- NLRB General Counsel Expands Focus on Non-Compete Agreements and Stay-Or-Pay Agreements
- FTC's Non-Compete Rule Struck Down
- District Court Finds in Favor of FTC, Declines to Issue Injunction
- DOL Increases Compensation Threshold for Exemption Eligibility
- Federal Trade Commission Announces New Rule Invalidating Non-Compete Agreements
- EEOC Announces Final Rule Providing Guidelines under the PWFA
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Immediate Termination
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update February 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Telephone Game
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update January 2024