During the summer, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine and the Ohio Liquor Control Commission instituted new rules governing alcohol sales. The emergency measure, intended to combat the spread of COVID-19, mandated that all alcohol-serving establishments cease alcohol sales at 10 p.m. The primary targets of the order were bars and restaurants which, according to the Governor, had contributed to outbreaks in Cleveland, Columbus, and Toledo. Customers could be served until 10 p.m., but had until 11 p.m. to finish their drinks.
The last-call order was to remain in effect for 120 days, but could be extended by the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR), a legislative committee of the Ohio General Assembly that reviews state agency rulemaking. JCARR declined to extend the order, allowing it to expire over the weekend. However, Ohio bars and restaurants should not expect to see a boom in late-night alcohol sales. As most restauranteurs are acutely aware, Ohio is continuing to impose a statewide, three-week curfew requiring citizens to stay home between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. with certain exceptions such as for work, emergencies, groceries and supplies—including carryout orders. Curfew violations have rarely been enforced to this point and Governor DeWine himself has stated: “We do not expect law enforcement to go pull people over.”
What does all this mean, in practical terms, for Ohio restaurants and bars as they continue to navigate this difficult time? Not much has changed. The fact that the curfew remains in effect means that Ohioans are still unable to enjoy a nightcap at their favorite watering hole. Allowing limited carryout alcohol sales during hours of operation that overlap with the curfew will likely not mitigate the loss of dine-in alcohol sales for many establishments during those hours, particularly for bars that do not have carryout food service and rely heavily on late-night alcohol sales on the premises.
The Brent Spence Bridge’s recent shutdown aside, Southwest Ohioans accustomed to crossing the Ohio River for their late-night bar entertainment might be surprised to find even stricter restrictions recently imposed by Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear.
Specifically, Governor Beshear ordered Kentucky’s bars and restaurants to close indoor dining (and drinking) service until December 13 in an effort to curb the pandemic. While delivery and takeout are still permitted, Kentuckians (and any interloping Ohioans) will not be permitted to sidle up to their favorite Kentucky bar for another couple of weeks.
The new prohibition imposed in Kentucky has faced immediate opposition. In fact, dozens of Louisville restauranteurs have signed a petition stating that even if Governor Beshear’s order is extended, they will still open their dining rooms at 50% capacity on December 14. Some establishments are not waiting until December 14 to challenge the governor’s order. At least two restaurants have already had their licenses suspended for violations, but have continued operations. Certainly, bars and restaurants flouting Governor Beshear’s order will pay some price for their failure to comply, though that price is not yet clear. Regardless, Kentucky’s continued prohibitions on indoor dining and drinking, and the industry’s response, is a situation worth monitoring.
Undoubtedly, the restaurant and bar industry have suffered greatly during the coronavirus pandemic. Whether in Ohio or Kentucky, state restrictions have fundamentally altered the business climate across all industries. KMK Law continues to monitor the dynamic regulatory environment of pandemic-related restrictions and has a multi-disciplinary team advising clients on these matters. Please contact a member of the KMK Law Coronavirus (COVID-19) Response Team for assistance, including those listed below.
 Talia Naquin & Adrienne DiPiazza, Governor DeWine’s 10 p.m. last call for alcohol to prevent spread of coronavirus approved, Fox8.com (July 31, 2020), available at https://fox8.com/news/coronavirus/gov-dewines-10-p-m-last-call-for-alcohol-to-prevent-spread-of-coronavirus-approved/.
 See About, Joint Comm. on Agency Rule Rev., http://www.jcarr.state.oh.us/about (last visited Dec. 1, 2020).
 See Jesse Balmert, Gov. Mike DeWine’s 10 p.m. last call order expired but curfew still bans late-night bar visits, Cincinnati.com (Nov. 30, 2020), available at https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/30/ohios-last-call-covid-19-order-expired-curfew-still-place/6464837002/.
 Jessie Balmert & Jackie Borchardt, Rather than close businesses, Ohio imposes 3-week curfew, Cincinnati.com (Nov. 17, 2020), available at https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/17/coronavirus-ohio-gov-mike-dewine-order-curfew-nov-17/6317088002/.
 Fire on the Brent Spence Bridge, Fox19.com (Nov. 11, 2020), available at https://www.fox19.com/video/2020/11/11/fire-brent-spence-bridge/.
 Chris Otts, Beshear closes bars, restaurants to indoor service starting Nov. 20, WDRB.com (Nov. 18, 2020), available at https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/beshear-closes-bars-restaurants-to-indoor-service-starting-nov-20/article_be9ae99c-29dc-11eb-8028-6ffe264bce87.html.
 Dhalia Ghabour, Online petition: Restaurants will reopen Dec. 14 with or without Beshear’s approval, Courier-Journal.com (Nov. 30, 2020), available at https://www.courier-journal.com/story/entertainment/dining/restaurant/2020/11/30/louisville-restaurants-say-theyll-open-without-governor-ok/6472157002/.
 Clint Mayhew, Indoor dining: Northern Kentucky Restaurant says it will stay open, fight coronavirus restrictions, Cincinnati.com (Nov. 25, 2020), available at https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/local/hebron/2020/11/25/nky-restaurant-pledges-stay-open-while-challenging-covid-19-orders/6419289002/; Bill Estep, Health department suspends license of KY restaurant for defying ban on indoor dining, Kentucky.com (Nov. 24, 2020), available at https://www.kentucky.com/news/coronavirus/article247393680.html#:~:text=Health%20department%20suspends%
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
© 2022 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
Matt Weigel practices in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, advising public and private clients on a wide range of corporate transactions and governance matters. He also assists clients in navigating a ...
Joe Lehnert focuses his practice in the areas of creditor’s rights and bankruptcy litigation. Joe combines his exceptional litigation skills with holistic business advice to help clients navigate a wide array of business ...
- Class Action Litigation
- Appellate Law
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Data Breach
- Securities Law
- Supreme Court
- Sixth Circuit
- Intellectual Property
- Social Media
- Trademark Litigation
- Initial Coin Offering
- Bet-the-Company Litigation
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Employment Law
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employer Policies
- Labor & Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Stock Drop
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Securities Litigation
- Drug Enforcement Agency
- Medical Marijuana
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Craft Brewing
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Copyright Law
- Environmental Law
- Fair Housing Act
- Health Care Act
- Healthcare Reform
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Religion Discrimination
- Seventh Circuit
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Cyber Insurance
- Electronically Stored Information
- Business Process Improvement
- Employment Litigation
- Receivership Statute
- Employer Handbook
- Employer Rules
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- E-Discovery Project Plan
- Predictive Coding
- TAR ( Technology Assisted Review)
- Quality Representation
- Land Use & Zoning
- Statute of Limitations
- Construction Litigation
- Federal Rule
- United States Supreme Court Clarifies Boundaries of Federal Civil Rule 60(b)
- Motion for Reconsideration in an Appeal: Sometimes the Court will Reconsider if you Argue its Initial Decision was Just Wrong
- TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez and the Impact on Class Action Litigation
- Questioning the Questionnaires: New PPP-Related Litigation Raises Issues for Borrowers
- "You Don't Have to Go Home But You Can't Stay Here": Updates to Ohio and Kentucky’s COVID-19 Orders Impacting Bars & Restaurants
- Kentucky Restaurants Begin Opening with Limited Capacity Amid COVID-19 Epidemic
- Ohio Restaurants and Bars Begin Soft Openings for Diners Amid COVID-19 Epidemic
- Supreme Court Sidesteps “Cy Pres” Challenge
- Golfers, New and Old - Be Careful!
- "Aloha Poke": Social Media and Consumer Perception are Part of the Trademark Enforcement Equation