With the announcement of the April 24 release date for the long anticipated Apple Watch (http://www.cnet.com/products/apple-watch/), this is a good time for employers to consider the topic of wearable technology. Of course, the Apple Watch is just the latest device in a long line of wearable technology innovations. Examples include Google Glass, Fitbit, Nike Fuelband and an array of wireless headsets and microphones. Also due for release in April is an alarming device called Kapture (http://kaptureaudio.com/), a wearable recording device that is always on and promises to make “it easy to save any 60-second snippet of audio after-the-fact, without taking you out of the moment.”
Employers have been dealing with smart phones for some time now and it is tempting to simply dismiss these wearable devices as more of the same in a slightly different format. However, the fact that these devices generate a significant amount of data, some without requiring any action by the user, make it worth considering how they might impact the workplace. By way of example, consider these hypothetical scenarios:
-
Managers and non-managers share health information generated by their wearable devices as part of a company sponsored program to improve fitness. An employee later claims that his employer had knowledge of a condition and his need for an accommodation and/or leave based on the data provided by his wearable device. The manager is also accused of improperly gathering health information about the employee.
-
In a wage and hour case, wearable technology data is used to bolster claims of unpaid overtime and off the clock work based on GPS data regarding employees’ locations.
-
GPS data regarding employees’ locations throughout the workday automatically uploads to a website accessible by non-employees, creating a map of employee routes and customer locations.
-
An employee causes an accident in a company car while distracted by a wearable device – the entire incident is recorded.
-
Plaintiffs’ counsel in a class action demands broad discovery of data generated by company provided wearable technology and the company discovers that the data is not being maintained according to the same policies as other electronically stored information.
-
An employee records video of a particularly rude customer and posts it online – the customer threatens a lawsuit for invasion of privacy.
As the foregoing list demonstrates, it is not difficult to imagine ways in which the data generated by wearable technology could create headaches for companies in the employment law arena. So what is the solution? An outright ban could raise a variety of issues and may not be feasible. The good news is that most employers already have policies addressing the broad issues raised above, e.g. security, trade secrets, discrimination, social media and safety. Employers need to reconsider these policies in light of wearable technology and make necessary revisions to specifically address potential issues.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- EEOC
- Immigration
- Affirmative Action
- Compliance
- Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- Discrimination
- Labor Law
- FMLA
- Wage & Hour
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Coronavirus
- Diversity
- Social Media
- Reasonable Accommodation
- FLSA
- Sexual Harassment
- Employer Policies
- Title VII
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Transgender Issues
- Employer Rules
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Overtime Pay
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- National Enforcement Plan
- OSHA
- Privacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Holiday Policies
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Workplace Accommodations
- Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- Paid Leave Laws
- Litigation
- Tax Credit
- IRS
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Medical Marijuana
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Accommodation
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- ADAAA
- ERISA
- Race Discrimination
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Disability
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Authorization Without Documentation: Employers Left with I-9 Compliance Questions Following TPS Expirations for El Salvador, Sudan, and Ukraine
- EEOC Moves to Rescind 2012 Criminal Background Check Guidance
- EEOC Proposes Overhaul of Federal Workplace Discrimination Complaint Process
- OFCCP Publishes Final Rules Reducing Federal Contractor Affirmative Action Obligations
- US Court of Appeals puts $100,000 H-1B Fee on Hold Again
- Asking Is Protected: Sixth Circuit Expands FMLA Retaliation Protections
- New DHS Rule Will Restrict Student Periods of Admission from Duration of Status to Fixed End Date
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies