On Friday evening, employers were delivered updates on two of the federal vaccine mandates, courtesy of the Eleventh and Sixth Circuits.
Out of Georgia, the Eleventh Circuit denied a request by the Biden Administration to dissolve a nationwide injunction of the federal contractor vaccine mandate. That federal contractor mandate has been blocked within Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee by virtue of a November 30, 2021 injunction, but on December 7, 2021 a U.S. District Court Judge in the Southern District of Georgia issued a nationwide injunction blocking the mandate’s implementation. The Eleventh Circuit denied the Administration’s request to immediately lift the nationwide injunction, but set an expedited briefing schedule on the merits of the Administration’s appeal. Should the appeal move forward as scheduled, we can expect the next decision from the Eleventh Circuit to come no earlier than mid-January. Of course, before then the Administration may choose to petition for a rehearing before the full Circuit, or for an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court.
But as one injunction stands, another one falls. On Friday evening, the Sixth Circuit dissolved the injunction to OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). That standard, which mandates employers with 100 employees or more to require employees be vaccinated or submit to weekly testing and wear masks, had originally been enjoined by the Fifth Circuit on November 12, 2021. All challenges to the ETS were then consolidated within the Sixth Circuit, and thus employers have been looking to that circuit as it considered whether to allow the injunction to stand. In a split decision, a three-judge panel dissolved the injunction, finding that OSHA had clear authority to regulate and protect workplace health and safety, including the transmission of viruses in the workplace. In its ruling, found here, the Court determined that OSHA acted within its authority when crafting the ETS, as the dangers posed by COVID-19 continue to constitute an “emergency” under the law.
The Sixth Circuit’s decision, however, is not the end of the line. Already, a collection of trade groups has filed an application seeking to overturn the decision with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who oversees the Sixth Circuit. The Application requests that the Supreme Court stay the effective date of the ETS, either outright or pending a full review by the Supreme Court itself.
So until we hear otherwise from the Supreme Court, the ETS is set to go into effect. As originally written, the ETS required that covered employers begin complying with the standard by December 5, 2021 (other than testing), and set a deadline to begin testing employees who are not fully vaccinated by January 4, 2022. Following the Sixth Circuit’s ruling OSHA announced that it would extend these deadlines, as long as the employer is otherwise exercising reasonable, good faith efforts to come into compliance with the ETS. Employers will have until January 10, 2022 to comply with the standard (other than testing), and until February 9, 2022 to begin testing procedures.
As further litigation is expected with regard to the federal contractor mandate and the ETS, employers should pay close attention to any further developments. The Supreme Court will likely have final say, on way or the other, on these mandates as well as other federal mandates the Administration has sought to impose. Until then, should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact a member of the Labor & Employment Practice Group.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Greg Robinson assists his clients in navigating the complex world of workplace laws and regulations. He has counseled clients on a wide array of employment matters, including wage and hour disputes, discrimination charges ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Employment Law
- Labor & Employment Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Tax Credit
- Title VII
- Overtime Pay
- Social Media
- Religion Discrimination
- Employer Policies
- Labor Law
- Employment Litigation
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Coronavirus
- Employer Rules
- Wage & Hour
- Department of Labor
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Artificial Intelligence
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- OSHA
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Compliance
- FLSA
- National Labor Relations Board
- Department of Justice
- Worker Classification
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Supreme Court
- NLRA
- Harassment
- Arbitration
- Diversity
- FMLA
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Litigation
- IRS
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- Whistleblower
- Federal Arbitration Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- Work Opportunity Tax Credit At Risk: Use It Before You Lose It
- IRS Releases Additional Guidance on New Tip and Overtime Tax Deductions for 2025
- EEOC Takes Aim at Perceived Anti-American Bias
- Ohio “Mini-WARN” Act Now In Effect: Key Compliance Takeaways for Employers
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price
- One Tweet Away From Trouble: Social Media at Work
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
