On Friday evening, employers were delivered updates on two of the federal vaccine mandates, courtesy of the Eleventh and Sixth Circuits.
Out of Georgia, the Eleventh Circuit denied a request by the Biden Administration to dissolve a nationwide injunction of the federal contractor vaccine mandate. That federal contractor mandate has been blocked within Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee by virtue of a November 30, 2021 injunction, but on December 7, 2021 a U.S. District Court Judge in the Southern District of Georgia issued a nationwide injunction blocking the mandate’s implementation. The Eleventh Circuit denied the Administration’s request to immediately lift the nationwide injunction, but set an expedited briefing schedule on the merits of the Administration’s appeal. Should the appeal move forward as scheduled, we can expect the next decision from the Eleventh Circuit to come no earlier than mid-January. Of course, before then the Administration may choose to petition for a rehearing before the full Circuit, or for an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court.
But as one injunction stands, another one falls. On Friday evening, the Sixth Circuit dissolved the injunction to OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). That standard, which mandates employers with 100 employees or more to require employees be vaccinated or submit to weekly testing and wear masks, had originally been enjoined by the Fifth Circuit on November 12, 2021. All challenges to the ETS were then consolidated within the Sixth Circuit, and thus employers have been looking to that circuit as it considered whether to allow the injunction to stand. In a split decision, a three-judge panel dissolved the injunction, finding that OSHA had clear authority to regulate and protect workplace health and safety, including the transmission of viruses in the workplace. In its ruling, found here, the Court determined that OSHA acted within its authority when crafting the ETS, as the dangers posed by COVID-19 continue to constitute an “emergency” under the law.
The Sixth Circuit’s decision, however, is not the end of the line. Already, a collection of trade groups has filed an application seeking to overturn the decision with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who oversees the Sixth Circuit. The Application requests that the Supreme Court stay the effective date of the ETS, either outright or pending a full review by the Supreme Court itself.
So until we hear otherwise from the Supreme Court, the ETS is set to go into effect. As originally written, the ETS required that covered employers begin complying with the standard by December 5, 2021 (other than testing), and set a deadline to begin testing employees who are not fully vaccinated by January 4, 2022. Following the Sixth Circuit’s ruling OSHA announced that it would extend these deadlines, as long as the employer is otherwise exercising reasonable, good faith efforts to come into compliance with the ETS. Employers will have until January 10, 2022 to comply with the standard (other than testing), and until February 9, 2022 to begin testing procedures.
As further litigation is expected with regard to the federal contractor mandate and the ETS, employers should pay close attention to any further developments. The Supreme Court will likely have final say, on way or the other, on these mandates as well as other federal mandates the Administration has sought to impose. Until then, should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact a member of the Labor & Employment Practice Group.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2026 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Greg Robinson assists his clients in navigating the complex world of workplace laws and regulations. He has counseled clients on a wide array of employment matters, including wage and hour disputes, discrimination charges ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- EEOC
- Department of Labor
- Discrimination
- Immigration
- Affirmative Action
- Compliance
- Labor Law
- FMLA
- NLRB
- Wage & Hour
- Arbitration
- Coronavirus
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Social Media
- Diversity
- Reasonable Accommodation
- FLSA
- Sexual Harassment
- Employer Policies
- Title VII
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Employer Rules
- Transgender Issues
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Overtime Pay
- OSHA
- National Enforcement Plan
- Privacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Holiday Policies
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Supreme Court
- Telework
- Federal Trade Commission
- Litigation
- Paid Leave Laws
- IRS
- Tax Credit
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Medical Marijuana
- Accommodation
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ADAAA
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- ERISA
- Race Discrimination
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Disability
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- Authorization Without Documentation: Employers Left with I-9 Compliance Questions Following TPS Expirations for El Salvador, Sudan, and Ukraine
- EEOC Moves to Rescind 2012 Criminal Background Check Guidance
- EEOC Proposes Overhaul of Federal Workplace Discrimination Complaint Process
- OFCCP Publishes Final Rules Reducing Federal Contractor Affirmative Action Obligations
- US Court of Appeals puts $100,000 H-1B Fee on Hold Again
- Asking Is Protected: Sixth Circuit Expands FMLA Retaliation Protections
- New DHS Rule Will Restrict Student Periods of Admission from Duration of Status to Fixed End Date
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
