Many employers are using or considering using smartphone apps for their employees. In such cases, employees download an app that can be used for a variety of purposes, including employee engagement, communication, work assignments, route and delivery information and more. While apps can be helpful, they also raise many employment law issues, including the following:
- Reimbursement: Two states – California and Illinois - have statutes specifically requiring reimbursement for required employee cell phone use. Several other states have statutes that arguably require cell phone reimbursement, including: Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, and District of Columbia.
- Wage and Hour Issues: The FLSA requires that employees be paid for all hours that the employer “suffers or permits” to be worked. When employees have an app on their phone, it opens the door to a lot of unauthorized work time related to using the app, checking messages, etc. App usage can also raise issues with break and meal time laws and minimum wage violations.
- Discrimination: If employers require the use of an app, employees must have a smartphone. If employers do not provide the phone, it becomes a condition of employment and employers may face claims that the requirement constitutes discrimination based on legally protected characteristics related to smartphone ownership.
- Privacy: Placing an app on a personal phone that tracks and gathers data (e.g. location) creates possible privacy issues. Most of these issues can be addressed by obtaining authorizations from employees regarding their reasonable expectations of privacy and limiting data collection during non-work hours.
- Safety: Having employees who drive use an app presents an inherent risk that needs to be addressed. Any accident that occurs due to distracted driving related to the employer’s app presents a risk of substantial liability. Similarly, distractions caused by app use in other potentially hazardous environments should be considered as well.
Listen to the new episode of The Practical Employment Law Podcast for insights on these issues and more.
You can listen here.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2023 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
Mark Chumley has experience representing clients in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims involving ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- NLRB
- Coronavirus
- Employment Litigation
- Labor Law
- National Labor Relations Board
- Workplace Violence
- Department of Labor
- Arbitration
- Discrimination
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Religion Discrimination
- IRS
- Disability Discrimination
- Litigation
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Race Discrimination
- Social Media
- OSHA
- Retirement
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Accommodation
- National Labor Relations Act
- ERISA
- Employer Handbook
- Wage & Hour
- Reasonable Accommodation
- EEOC
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- ADAAA
- Title VII
- NLRA
- Unions
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Technology
- Privacy
- 401(k)
- Transgender Issues
- FMLA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Disability
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Class Action Litigation
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Benefits
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Overtime Pay
- Privacy Laws
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Compensable Time
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- New NLRB General Counsel Guidance Threatens Ability to Enforce Non-Compete Agreements
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Exploding 5 Employment Law Myths
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Economics of Employment Law
- NLRB Issues Guidance on the Recent Mclauren Macomb Decision
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Thoughts On Workplace Violence
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Pay Transparency Laws and Remote Workers
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update Week of 3/6/23
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: E.W.A. - Straight Outta Payroll
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update Week of 1/23/23
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Obligatory New Year's Episode