The third and final episode in the podcast mini-series - Termination Done Right - covers additional steps for employers to consider taking to minimize the damage in the event there is litigation over a termination decision. Steps include:
1. Arbitration: In arbitration, parties agree to allow a neutral arbitrator to serve as both judge and jury and decide their dispute instead of going to court. Courts generally enforce arbitration agreements between employers and employees but there are pros and cons for employers to consider, including:
Pros:
No Jury – Taking the case away from a jury and allowing a trained arbitrator to decide the case is viewed as a positive by many employers;
Faster and Cheaper – In most cases, arbitration proceedings are resolved quicker than cases in court. It is possible for arbitration proceedings to be cheaper than traditional litigation but it is not guaranteed;
Lower Settlement Values – One issue that drives settlement value is the threat of a runaway jury verdict but when juries are removed from the equation, the settlement value of a case tends to be lower;
More Privacy – While arbitration proceedings are not confidential, they are not as public as a court proceeding.
Cons:
Arbitration Fight – Employers may find themselves in costly court fights over the enforceability of arbitration agreements;
More Weak Claims – Unlike litigation in court, there are less opportunities to dispose of arbitration proceedings prior to a hearing, meaning that weaker claims are more likely to make it to a hearing in arbitration;
Costs – While arbitration has been traditionally viewed as a cheaper alternative to litigation, costs have been rising steadily over the years and some question whether the economics continue to favor arbitration;
No Appeals – Unlike a court case, arbitration decisions are rarely appealable, meaning that parties may be stuck with an obviously flawed decision.
Major Arbitration Providers include:
American Arbitration Association (https://www.adr.org/)
JAMS (https://www.jamsadr.com/)
NAM (https://www.namadr.com/)
CPR (https://www.cpradr.org/)
FORUM (https://www.adrforum.com/)
2. Jury Waivers: Jury trial waivers require employees to waive their right to have a jury decide their employment claims; a judge decides the case instead.
3. Class Action Waivers: Class action waivers limit employees to bringing only claims on their own behalf rather than joining a class action.
4. EPLI Coverage: Employment practices liability insurance, known as EPL insurance or EPLI, provides coverage to employers against claims made by employees alleging certain employment related claims.
Listen to the new episode of The Practical Employment Law Podcast for insights on these issues and more.
You can listen here.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Religion Discrimination
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Rules
- Labor Law
- Discrimination
- Wage & Hour
- EEOC
- Coronavirus
- Department of Labor
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- NLRB
- Artificial Intelligence
- Title VII
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Worker Classification
- Compliance
- FLSA
- Department of Justice
- National Labor Relations Board
- Supreme Court
- Harassment
- NLRA
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Diversity
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Overtime Pay
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Whistleblower
- Federal Arbitration Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Ohio “Mini-WARN” Act Now In Effect: Key Compliance Takeaways for Employers
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price
- One Tweet Away From Trouble: Social Media at Work
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims