The third and final episode in the podcast mini-series - Termination Done Right - covers additional steps for employers to consider taking to minimize the damage in the event there is litigation over a termination decision. Steps include:
1. Arbitration: In arbitration, parties agree to allow a neutral arbitrator to serve as both judge and jury and decide their dispute instead of going to court. Courts generally enforce arbitration agreements between employers and employees but there are pros and cons for employers to consider, including:
Pros:
No Jury – Taking the case away from a jury and allowing a trained arbitrator to decide the case is viewed as a positive by many employers;
Faster and Cheaper – In most cases, arbitration proceedings are resolved quicker than cases in court. It is possible for arbitration proceedings to be cheaper than traditional litigation but it is not guaranteed;
Lower Settlement Values – One issue that drives settlement value is the threat of a runaway jury verdict but when juries are removed from the equation, the settlement value of a case tends to be lower;
More Privacy – While arbitration proceedings are not confidential, they are not as public as a court proceeding.
Cons:
Arbitration Fight – Employers may find themselves in costly court fights over the enforceability of arbitration agreements;
More Weak Claims – Unlike litigation in court, there are less opportunities to dispose of arbitration proceedings prior to a hearing, meaning that weaker claims are more likely to make it to a hearing in arbitration;
Costs – While arbitration has been traditionally viewed as a cheaper alternative to litigation, costs have been rising steadily over the years and some question whether the economics continue to favor arbitration;
No Appeals – Unlike a court case, arbitration decisions are rarely appealable, meaning that parties may be stuck with an obviously flawed decision.
Major Arbitration Providers include:
American Arbitration Association (https://www.adr.org/)
JAMS (https://www.jamsadr.com/)
NAM (https://www.namadr.com/)
CPR (https://www.cpradr.org/)
FORUM (https://www.adrforum.com/)
2. Jury Waivers: Jury trial waivers require employees to waive their right to have a jury decide their employment claims; a judge decides the case instead.
3. Class Action Waivers: Class action waivers limit employees to bringing only claims on their own behalf rather than joining a class action.
4. EPLI Coverage: Employment practices liability insurance, known as EPL insurance or EPLI, provides coverage to employers against claims made by employees alleging certain employment related claims.
Listen to the new episode of The Practical Employment Law Podcast for insights on these issues and more.
You can listen here.
Topics/Tags
Select- Employment Law
- Labor & Employment Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Tax Credit
- Title VII
- Overtime Pay
- Social Media
- Religion Discrimination
- Employer Policies
- Labor Law
- Employment Litigation
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Coronavirus
- Employer Rules
- Wage & Hour
- Department of Labor
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Artificial Intelligence
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- OSHA
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Compliance
- FLSA
- National Labor Relations Board
- Department of Justice
- Worker Classification
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Supreme Court
- NLRA
- Harassment
- Arbitration
- Diversity
- FMLA
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Litigation
- IRS
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- Whistleblower
- Federal Arbitration Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- Work Opportunity Tax Credit At Risk: Use It Before You Lose It
- IRS Releases Additional Guidance on New Tip and Overtime Tax Deductions for 2025
- EEOC Takes Aim at Perceived Anti-American Bias
- Ohio “Mini-WARN” Act Now In Effect: Key Compliance Takeaways for Employers
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price
- One Tweet Away From Trouble: Social Media at Work
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response