There has been a lot of news coverage lately of Rep. Eric Massa’s resignation and apparently related allegations of harassment of male staffers. One question that has been asked several times is whether Massa is gay. In response, some have dismissed such questions as inappropriate. (I was going to link an article but most have inappropriate language, so Google it if you don’t believe me). Interestingly enough, if this drama were being played out in the context of a sexual harassment lawsuit, the question of the alleged same sex harasser’s sexual orientation would be relevant.
In same-sex workplace harassment cases, demonstrating that the harassing conduct was tinged with offensive sexual connotations is not sufficient to prove the discrimination was “because of sex,” which is an essential element. Title VII forbids only discrimination because of sex. Courts have held that there are three ways that a plaintiff alleging same-sex sexual harassment can demonstrate that the harassment was because of sex:
- The harasser was motivated by sexual desire;
- The harasser was expressing a general hostility to the presence of one sex in the workplace; or
- The harasser was acting to punish the victim's noncompliance with gender stereotypes.
Based on everything I’ve read about the Massa situation, if a male staffer was to pursue a claim, the first approach above (i.e. motivated by sexual desire) would be the natural choice. Let me know what you think – mchumley@kmklaw.com.
Topics/Tags
Select- Employment Law
- Labor & Employment Law
- Discrimination
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- EEOC
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor
- Supreme Court
- Title VII
- Compliance
- NLRB
- Coronavirus
- Workplace Violence
- FLSA
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Department of Justice
- Religion Discrimination
- Reasonable Accommodation
- NLRA
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Diversity
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Federal Trade Commission
- Overtime Pay
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employment Litigation
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Unions
- Whistleblower
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- United States Supreme Court
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis
- The Independent Contractor Tug-of-War: Navigating the Latest DOL Shifts
- ICE Raids and Audits – What’s an Employer to Do
- New Online Registration Requirements for Foreign Nationals
- Workplace Violence: Are You Taking Required Steps to Protect Your Employees?
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?