Let me begin by refusing to apologize for what I’m about to type — Robocop is a great movie. It is violent and vulgar at several points but not so much so by today’s standards. It is set in a future version of Detroit in which crime is rampant and the city is seeking the assistance of a private corporation to provide robotic police officers. After a policeman is gunned down by a drug gang and left for dead, he is transformed by the corporation into a half man, half machine peace officer – the titular Robocop. Guided by three programmed directives (1. Serve the public trust; 2. Protect the innocent; and 3. Uphold the law) and armed with an exceptionally large handgun, he makes short work of violent criminals and causes the rest of the police force to worry about job security. Of course, all is not well. Robocop begins to recall his prior human existence and there is the matter of his secret fourth directive.
You’ve probably seen at least some of Robocop as it is often rerun on cable networks. Perhaps you were too distracted by the shiny mechanical man and the dystopian future to notice that not one but two critical plot points involve labor and employment law issues. First, a police strike sends the city into chaos. There is not much in the plot to analyze from a legal standpoint. Generally, strikes by public employees are illegal in Michigan but that does not mean they cannot happen, particularly in a grim dystopian future.
The more important employment law moment occurs in the climatic final scene of the film and involves the termination of the employment of one of the film’s main characters. In Michigan, employees are presumed to be “at will,” meaning that they may be terminated for any reason, so long as it is not illegal. Some may quibble that the character in question would likely have had an employment agreement with a clause governing termination but there is no evidence of this in the film and, therefore, the presumption of at-will employment must stand. Thus, the film is not only entertaining but accurate in its depiction of labor and employment law.
Labor Law Content **** (out of five)
Labor Law Accuracy ***** (out of five)
- Partner
Mark Chumley has experience representing management in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Coronavirus
- Arbitration
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- IRS
- OSHA
- Department of Labor
- NLRB
- Employer Policies
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Litigation
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Retirement
- Social Media
- Accommodation
- ERISA
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Employer Handbook
- Employment Litigation
- Reasonable Accommodation
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Wage & Hour
- EEOC
- NLRA
- ADAAA
- Title VII
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Unions
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- 401(k)
- Technology
- Privacy
- Transgender Issues
- Workplace Accommodations
- FMLA
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Disability
- Workplace Violence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Religion Discrimination
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Benefits
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Department of Justice
- Privacy Laws
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Social Media Content
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Future of Arbitration
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Gig Economy
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update Week of 3/7/2022
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update Week of 2/7/2022
- Supreme Court Re-Implements Stay of Vaccine Mandate for Employers, Upholds CMS Mandate
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Twelve Thoughts About Vaccine Mandates
- Update on Status of Federal Contractor Mandate and OSHA’s ETS
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Employment Law Advice from Ebenezer Scrooge
- Update on Status of All Federal Vaccine Mandates
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Federal Vaccine Mandate(s) Update