According to the latest news, jobs have dropped by another 95,000 in the past month and unemployment continues to hover at 9.6%. In short, things do not appear to be improving and it is likely that we will continue to see workforce reductions until they do.
I ran across this article today (top item), which reports that a former Bank of America Corp. computer programmer has been accused in a lawsuit by the bank of stealing 21 confidential files the day before he was to be fired as part of a 400 employee workforce reduction. Bank of America is seeking a court order requiring the employee to return the files, plus unspecified damages. The files apparently included profit-and-loss figures, current securities trading positions and company risk assessments. Bank of America discovered the theft through a security review of large files sent by employees to e-mail addresses outside the company.
This story has a couple of lessons. First, companies need to be pro-active about protecting their trade secrets rather than simply relying on policies. Bank of America had security procedures in place that worked – do you? In my experience, employees who lose their jobs involuntarily are much more likely to try to harm their former employer in some way to gain an advantage for themselves. If you are planning a workforce reduction in this economy, protection of trade secrets should be a priority. Consider the following:
Before:
- Make sure policies are up to date and adequately protect trade secrets;
- Audit personnel files to ensure that employees have signed confidentiality and non-compete agreements in place;
- Ensure that you have taken adequate steps to protect trade secrets by limiting access to documents, including electronic access;
- Conduct periodic training to remind employees of their obligations;
- Develop security procedures to ensure that documents cannot be removed without authorization – work with your information technology department to set up electronic monitoring and protections;
- Consider banning the use of all USB devices on company computers;
During:
- Step up monitoring and other security procedures to ensure that confidential information cannot be removed;
- Promptly recover keys from terminated employees and lock out passwords and other access to computer systems;
- Promptly recover all company electronics capable of storing data, e.g. laptops, PDAs and telephones;
- Supervise the removal of personal items by terminated employees;
- Conduct exit interviews during which employees should be reminded of on-going obligations;
- Provide employees with copies of agreements governing post-employment conduct;
After:
- Continue monitoring for a period of time to ensure that terminated employees do not attempt to access company systems or persuade former co-workers to provide access or documents;
- Aggressively pursue any breaches of restrictive covenants.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Wage & Hour
- Discrimination
- Labor Law
- EEOC
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Department of Labor
- Artificial Intelligence
- Coronavirus
- Compliance
- NLRB
- OSHA
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Title VII
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Religion Discrimination
- FLSA
- Supreme Court
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- National Labor Relations Board
- Diversity
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Arbitration
- Federal Trade Commission
- FMLA
- Overtime Pay
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Accommodations
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Social Media
- Medical Marijuana
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Whistleblower
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis
- The Independent Contractor Tug-of-War: Navigating the Latest DOL Shifts
- ICE Raids and Audits – What’s an Employer to Do