I am amazed at how often employment litigation is a self inflicted wound for the employer. In an ongoing series, I am going to share some of the common self-inflicted wounds that I have witnessed and offer some suggestions for avoiding them.
Self-Inflicted Wound — Poor Writing
By now, most employers understand that discipline and terminations should be memorialized in writing. A problem remains with the quality of the writing. In the past year, I tried two cases that could have been minimized or avoided if the written documentation of discipline and termination had been more effective. The really unfortunate thing is that if an attorney knowledgeable in labor and employment law had spent a few minutes reviewing the documents before they were used, the issues that were raised in the cases probably would have been avoided. Most employers think twice before calling their attorneys to review documents because of the expense. However, paying for a quarter or half hour of an attorney's time to prevent a problem is preferable to paying for the time required to defend a lawsuit.
As to writing, the underlying problem is that business people often write discipline and termination documents as if they were writing for business rather than legal purposes. They communicate, they explain, they expound, and they write in that somewhat roundabout way designed to avoid offending anyone. As a result, they often create documents that are easily shredded by attorneys. By way of example, consider a chronically tardy employee who receives this discipline:
John Doe has been habitually late in arriving to work and this has caused his performance to suffer and has been detrimental to the morale of his department. As a result, he is being disciplined.
As written, the above statement generates hours of deposition questions for the unlucky author to answer:
- What do you consider “habitual” tardiness; how often per week/month/year?
- What is the company's policy for tardiness – does it refer to “habitual tardiness”?
- On what dates was John late?
- How late was he on each date?
- Did John call in to let anyone know he was running late?
- How did John's performance suffer?
- What evidence is there that his tardiness caused his performance to suffer?
- How did his tardiness impact morale?
- Which employees reported that their morale was lowered because of John's tardiness?
Etc., etc., etc.
The better approach is to stick strictly to the facts, identify the conduct as unacceptable, and indicate the consequences of further misconduct. In our example:
John Doe was more than 10 minutes late in arriving to work on January 10, 12, and 13, 2010. This tardiness is unacceptable. John must report to work on time. Further tardiness may lead to additional discipline up to and including termination of employment.
Of course, there is no magic approach to writing discipline that works in every case. Even my “good” example might not be appropriate depending on the underlying circumstances. That is why there is no substitute for involving a labor and employment attorney before an issue is created by poor documentation.
- Partner
Mark Chumley has experience representing clients in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims involving ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Coronavirus
- Employment Law
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- National Labor Relations Board
- Department of Labor
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Workplace Accommodations
- NLRB
- FMLA
- Medical Marijuana
- Employment Litigation
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Religion Discrimination
- Arbitration
- Workplace Violence
- Discrimination
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- IRS
- Whistleblower
- Litigation
- Disability Discrimination
- Employer Policies
- Social Media
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- Retirement
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- ERISA
- Employer Handbook
- EEOC
- ADAAA
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Unions
- Title VII
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- NLRA
- Transgender Issues
- 401(k)
- Disability
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Securities Law
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Compensable Time
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Immediate Termination
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update February 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Telephone Game
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update January 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Employment Law Issues to Watch in 2024
- Department of Labor Announces New Independent Contractor Rule to Go into Effect March 11, 2024
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Employment Law Naughty & Nice List
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Reefer Madness
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Office Romance Episode
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: New Laws Protecting Pregnant and Nursing Workers