Have you heard about the non-solicit suit involving communications on LinkedIn? Well, it seems that an employer in Minnesota is suing former employees and their new employer over violations of the employees’ non-solicitation agreements. The twist is that one of the employees allegedly did her solicitation through her LinkedIn page, communicating with several former colleagues after going to work for a competitor.
Follow the link for the bizjournals.com article.
Some commentators are raising red flags — do your non-compete agreements address social media communications; are your trade secrets at risk in the brave new world of social media? Could this be the start of a . . . . wait for it . . . .litigation explosion?!
Unlikely. In fact, I believe that this points to some good news for employers. Social media is a new means of communication but it is still communication like e-mail, telephones, and faxes.
Like the older forms of communication, there are appropriate and inappropriate social media communications. No one would suggest that a non-solicit agreement means that an employee cannot call a former co-worker on the telephone and chat about politics, sports, fashion, or just about anything except soliciting the co-worker to leave his or her employer.
The same is true of social media. It is only the inappropriate communications that are cause for concern, but there is good news for employers when it comes to these communications. Unlike older forms of communication, social media communication is largely visible and leaves an indelible record. If your ex-employee is foolish enough to solicit former co-workers or customers via social media, you have the proverbial smoking gun to enforce your restrictive covenants. Such evidence is far superior to disputed testimony over what was discussed in a phone call or lunch meeting, which is standard issue in most litigation over non-solicitation agreements.
As with many other employment related claims, the biggest impact of social media may be in the way in which evidence is gathered and claims are established, rather than in the development of a novel type of claim.
Let me know what you think. You'll find a link to my email at the CONTACT line below.
- Partner
Mark Chumley has experience representing clients in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims involving ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Coronavirus
- Labor Law
- FMLA
- NLRB
- Religion Discrimination
- Employment Litigation
- National Labor Relations Board
- Workplace Accommodations
- Workplace Violence
- Whistleblower
- Department of Labor
- Arbitration
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Discrimination
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- IRS
- Disability Discrimination
- Litigation
- Employer Policies
- Social Media
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Retirement
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Accommodation
- National Labor Relations Act
- ERISA
- Employer Handbook
- Wage & Hour
- Reasonable Accommodation
- EEOC
- ADAAA
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Title VII
- Unions
- Employer Rules
- NLRA
- Sexual Harassment
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Technology
- Privacy
- Transgender Issues
- 401(k)
- Disability
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- SECURE Act
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Privacy Laws
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Department of Justice
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: New Laws Protecting Pregnant and Nursing Workers
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: What is a Whistleblower and Why Should You Care?
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: FMLA Traps for Employers
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Artificial Intelligence and Employment Law
- U. S. Supreme Court Clarifies Standard for Workplace Religious Accommodations
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Non-Compete Agreements Under Attack
- New NLRB General Counsel Guidance Threatens Ability to Enforce Non-Compete Agreements
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Exploding 5 Employment Law Myths
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Economics of Employment Law
- NLRB Issues Guidance on the Recent Mclauren Macomb Decision