Here is a hypothetical attorney-client interaction:
Client: I called because we are planning to eliminate a couple of positions. We have decided which positions to eliminate and want to move forward as soon as possible.
Attorney: I’m happy to help. Let’s discuss your decision making process, who has been selected for elimination and what needs to be done next.
Client: Actually, I was hoping you could just send over some form severance agreements and maybe a checklist of things we need to do in this kind of situation.
I bet this sounds familiar. I’ve had conversations like this many times and they can be stressful for a couple of reasons. First, if the attorney resists the request, the client may think he or she just wants to charge time for filling in forms; a charge that could be easily avoided by letting the client do it. Second, if the attorney agrees and hands over form documents, there is always the concern that the client will not use them properly or fail to spot the issues not covered by a standard form or checklist.
Based on the second concern, I think that using forms without consultation or analysis is almost always a bad idea. This goes for attorneys as well as clients. Some attorneys, especially inexperienced attorneys, rely too heavily on form documents. Clients looking to save on legal fees often engage in the above conversation with their attorneys or worse yet, recycle old documents or find forms on the internet. The problem with all of these approaches is that there is no substitute for actually analyzing a situation to spot and manage the issues.
I am not suggesting that forms and checklists should never be used, nor am I advocating for attorneys charging clients to reinvent the wheel every time they address an issue. Using forms and checklists can save the client time and money on the finished product but they can never be a substitute for sound legal analysis. Blindly relying on forms is a recipe for disaster that can expose an employer to liability well beyond the legal fees supposedly saved by skipping a consultation with an attorney.
Let me know if you agree. You'll find a link to my email at the CONTACT line below.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Wage & Hour
- Artificial Intelligence
- Labor Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Department of Labor
- Coronavirus
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Harassment
- OSHA
- Title VII
- Compliance
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Religion Discrimination
- FLSA
- Department of Justice
- Supreme Court
- NLRA
- National Labor Relations Board
- Privacy
- Diversity
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Arbitration
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Federal Trade Commission
- FMLA
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Accommodations
- Overtime Pay
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Social Media
- Medical Marijuana
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Whistleblower
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis