I am not a huge fan of the comedy-drama genre but I had to make an exception for “In Good Company,” given the premise of the film. Dan Foreman (Dennis Quaid) is an advertising executive for a magazine called Sports America that is acquired by GlobeCom early in the film. Fifty-one year old Dan is demoted from his corner office position and assigned a new boss, 20-something Carter Duryea (Topher Grace). Hilarity ensues as the two learn to work together and adjust to their situation.
As for the labor and employment content, it was a bit of a disappointment. Obviously, I selected this film for the apparent age discrimination issue but it stayed clear of legal issues, focusing instead on the human side of the plot. A couple of points did jump out at me. First, it does appear that Carter was selected by GlobeCom based on merit — he was an up and comer at GlobeCom when the acquisition took place. There was no real explanation beyond that for his being placed above Dan but there was also no indication of age bias. Moreover, Dan is offered continued employment, making discrimination even less likely. There is one part of the film where some positions are eliminated and Carter indicates that two of the individuals to be eliminated are not “pulling their weight.” This would seem to indicate subjective decision making, which is not the best approach to a RIF. Again, no legal issues are raised explicitly and therein lies my problem with the movie.
It taxes credulity to think that Dan, who had some serious financial burdens, or one of the other victims of the RIF would not lawyer up and try to get a better deal. Particularly when the apparent decision maker — Carter — looks like he’s barely old enough to drive his new Porsche. As some defense lawyers like to say, the “optics” were problematic; a situation that frequently leads to litigation in the real world. For me, it is like an action movie where a car makes a long jump over some obstacle, endures a bone shattering landing and drives away with hardly a scratch. Or where the action hero gets hit in the head with a shovel and jumps up to fight on. When I watch a movie I can suspend disbelief, but only up to a point.
Labor Law Content ** (out of five)
Labor Law Accuracy ** (out of five)
- Partner
Mark Chumley has experience representing management in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Coronavirus
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- NLRB
- Discrimination
- Department of Labor
- IRS
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Retirement
- NLRA
- Arbitration
- Employer Policies
- ERISA
- Race Discrimination
- Accommodation
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Litigation
- Social Media
- Reasonable Accommodation
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Employer Handbook
- Employment Litigation
- EEOC
- Wage & Hour
- 401(k)
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Title VII
- ADAAA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Sexual Harassment
- Employer Rules
- Unions
- Transgender Issues
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Technology
- Securities Law
- Privacy
- FMLA
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Disability
- Workplace Violence
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Sixth Circuit
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- OSHA
- Overtime Pay
- Religion Discrimination
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Representative Election Regulations
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Department of Justice
- Benefits
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Privacy Laws
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Healthcare Reform
- Telecommuting
- Electronically Stored Information
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Social Media Content
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Welcome 2021 - 5 Things for Employers to Consider
- Congressional Proposal Extends Tax Credits to Companies Providing Paid Leave, but Allows Requirement to Expire
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: EEOC Issues New Guidance on COVID-19 Vaccinations
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Non-Compete Agreements - Five Mistakes by Three Parties
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Employment At-Will – Myth or Reality?
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: COVID-19 Immunity Laws
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Reductions in Force - Key Factors to Consider
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast
- 5 Things Employers Should Know About Military Leave
- Ohio Passes COVID Immunity Law - Employers Beware