I am not a huge fan of the comedy-drama genre but I had to make an exception for “In Good Company,” given the premise of the film. Dan Foreman (Dennis Quaid) is an advertising executive for a magazine called Sports America that is acquired by GlobeCom early in the film. Fifty-one year old Dan is demoted from his corner office position and assigned a new boss, 20-something Carter Duryea (Topher Grace). Hilarity ensues as the two learn to work together and adjust to their situation.
As for the labor and employment content, it was a bit of a disappointment. Obviously, I selected this film for the apparent age discrimination issue but it stayed clear of legal issues, focusing instead on the human side of the plot. A couple of points did jump out at me. First, it does appear that Carter was selected by GlobeCom based on merit — he was an up and comer at GlobeCom when the acquisition took place. There was no real explanation beyond that for his being placed above Dan but there was also no indication of age bias. Moreover, Dan is offered continued employment, making discrimination even less likely. There is one part of the film where some positions are eliminated and Carter indicates that two of the individuals to be eliminated are not “pulling their weight.” This would seem to indicate subjective decision making, which is not the best approach to a RIF. Again, no legal issues are raised explicitly and therein lies my problem with the movie.
It taxes credulity to think that Dan, who had some serious financial burdens, or one of the other victims of the RIF would not lawyer up and try to get a better deal. Particularly when the apparent decision maker — Carter — looks like he’s barely old enough to drive his new Porsche. As some defense lawyers like to say, the “optics” were problematic; a situation that frequently leads to litigation in the real world. For me, it is like an action movie where a car makes a long jump over some obstacle, endures a bone shattering landing and drives away with hardly a scratch. Or where the action hero gets hit in the head with a shovel and jumps up to fight on. When I watch a movie I can suspend disbelief, but only up to a point.
Labor Law Content ** (out of five)
Labor Law Accuracy ** (out of five)
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- EEOC
- Immigration
- Affirmative Action
- Compliance
- Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- Discrimination
- Labor Law
- FMLA
- Wage & Hour
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Coronavirus
- Diversity
- Social Media
- Reasonable Accommodation
- FLSA
- Sexual Harassment
- Employer Policies
- Title VII
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Transgender Issues
- Employer Rules
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Overtime Pay
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- National Enforcement Plan
- OSHA
- Privacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Holiday Policies
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Workplace Accommodations
- Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- Paid Leave Laws
- Litigation
- Tax Credit
- IRS
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Medical Marijuana
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Accommodation
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- ADAAA
- ERISA
- Race Discrimination
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Disability
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Authorization Without Documentation: Employers Left with I-9 Compliance Questions Following TPS Expirations for El Salvador, Sudan, and Ukraine
- EEOC Moves to Rescind 2012 Criminal Background Check Guidance
- EEOC Proposes Overhaul of Federal Workplace Discrimination Complaint Process
- OFCCP Publishes Final Rules Reducing Federal Contractor Affirmative Action Obligations
- US Court of Appeals puts $100,000 H-1B Fee on Hold Again
- Asking Is Protected: Sixth Circuit Expands FMLA Retaliation Protections
- New DHS Rule Will Restrict Student Periods of Admission from Duration of Status to Fixed End Date
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies