I am not a huge fan of the comedy-drama genre but I had to make an exception for “In Good Company,” given the premise of the film. Dan Foreman (Dennis Quaid) is an advertising executive for a magazine called Sports America that is acquired by GlobeCom early in the film. Fifty-one year old Dan is demoted from his corner office position and assigned a new boss, 20-something Carter Duryea (Topher Grace). Hilarity ensues as the two learn to work together and adjust to their situation.
As for the labor and employment content, it was a bit of a disappointment. Obviously, I selected this film for the apparent age discrimination issue but it stayed clear of legal issues, focusing instead on the human side of the plot. A couple of points did jump out at me. First, it does appear that Carter was selected by GlobeCom based on merit — he was an up and comer at GlobeCom when the acquisition took place. There was no real explanation beyond that for his being placed above Dan but there was also no indication of age bias. Moreover, Dan is offered continued employment, making discrimination even less likely. There is one part of the film where some positions are eliminated and Carter indicates that two of the individuals to be eliminated are not “pulling their weight.” This would seem to indicate subjective decision making, which is not the best approach to a RIF. Again, no legal issues are raised explicitly and therein lies my problem with the movie.
It taxes credulity to think that Dan, who had some serious financial burdens, or one of the other victims of the RIF would not lawyer up and try to get a better deal. Particularly when the apparent decision maker — Carter — looks like he’s barely old enough to drive his new Porsche. As some defense lawyers like to say, the “optics” were problematic; a situation that frequently leads to litigation in the real world. For me, it is like an action movie where a car makes a long jump over some obstacle, endures a bone shattering landing and drives away with hardly a scratch. Or where the action hero gets hit in the head with a shovel and jumps up to fight on. When I watch a movie I can suspend disbelief, but only up to a point.
Labor Law Content ** (out of five)
Labor Law Accuracy ** (out of five)
- Partner
Mark Chumley has experience representing management in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Coronavirus
- Arbitration
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- IRS
- OSHA
- Department of Labor
- NLRB
- Employer Policies
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Litigation
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Retirement
- Social Media
- Accommodation
- ERISA
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Employer Handbook
- Employment Litigation
- Reasonable Accommodation
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Wage & Hour
- EEOC
- NLRA
- ADAAA
- Title VII
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Unions
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- 401(k)
- Technology
- Privacy
- Transgender Issues
- Workplace Accommodations
- FMLA
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Disability
- Workplace Violence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Religion Discrimination
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Benefits
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Department of Justice
- Privacy Laws
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Social Media Content
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Future of Arbitration
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Gig Economy
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update Week of 3/7/2022
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update Week of 2/7/2022
- Supreme Court Re-Implements Stay of Vaccine Mandate for Employers, Upholds CMS Mandate
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Twelve Thoughts About Vaccine Mandates
- Update on Status of Federal Contractor Mandate and OSHA’s ETS
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Employment Law Advice from Ebenezer Scrooge
- Update on Status of All Federal Vaccine Mandates
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Federal Vaccine Mandate(s) Update