Immigration enforcement by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has recently increased. Taking a proactive approach could help employers prepare to face immigration enforcement actions, such as raids or I-9 audits, and mitigate employer risks. The first step is for employers to understand and familiarize themselves with the differences between ICE audits and raids.
What is Form I-9 - Employment Eligibility Verification?
All U.S. employers are required to complete Form I-9 - Employment Eligibility Verification to verify the identity and work authorization of every individual hired for employment in the United States, whether they are US citizens or foreign nationals.
What is an ICE Audit?
An ICE audit is an inspection by authorized government officials to determine an employer’s compliance with employment eligibility laws, such as Form I-9 verifications.
Officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Department of Labor (DOL) possess authority to inspect employers’ Form I-9 records. Prior to an ICE audit, an employer will generally receive a written Notice of Inspection at least 3 days before the inspection is to occur. Officials generally choose where they will conduct a Form I-9 inspection. For example, officials may ask that an employer bring all or requested Form I-9 records to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office, or they may arrange for an inspection onsite.
When officials arrive to inspect an employer’s Form I-9 records, the employer must be prepared to retrieve and reproduce electronically stored records and any other documents the officer requests. Employers who violate the law may be subject to civil fines and/or criminal penalties (typically imposed when there is a pattern or practice of violations).
What is an ICE Raid?
Unlike ICE audits, raids are unannounced, and thus far more disruptive to the workplace. Raids target unauthorized workers or suspected illegal hiring practices. During a raid, ICE agents arrive at the worksite and surround the premises, monitoring all exits and entrances. The goal is to identify, detain, and arrest unauthorized workers at a worksite.
What should Employers Do?
Employers may take the following steps prior to an audit and raid:
- Contact your employment/immigration counsel.
- Perform an internal I-9 audit to ensure compliance with the law. Such internal audits help employers identify and correct any violations prior to an ICE audit or raid.
- Train HR professionals to ensure that they are up to date with recent changes.
- Provide Form I-9 training to ensure compliance with immigration and record retention.
- Use E-Verify to improve compliance with work authorization verification.
- Speak to counsel regarding substantive or technical violations.
- Create an ICE raid action plan. Have a plan for how your business will respond to a potential ICE raid.
- Brief leadership, managers, and HR personnel on basic legal rights and internal protocols for handling law enforcement visits.
- Educate employees regarding their rights during a raid.
During an ICE raid, employers should:
- Always remain calm, polite, respectful, and cooperative.
- Stay calm and request identification. Politely ask ICE agents for their official credentials, noting names and badge numbers.
- Request any warrant or official documentation that specifies the scope of the search.
- Review the warrant’s scope.
- Contact legal counsel immediately.
- Protect your employees. Reassure staff that they may request a lawyer.
- Document the encounter.
- Take appropriate follow-up steps after any visit from ICE.
- Communicate with employees. Provide updates and clarity on what occurred and what they should do moving forward.
- Handle all follow-up with ICE through your attorney.
Cooperate with ICE officials. Remind employees not to interfere with the raid.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
John Milligan practices in the firm’s Labor & Employment Group where he regularly counsels clients as to best labor and employment practices, litigation avoidance, dispute resolution techniques, records retention, contract ...
- Associate
Mianda Bashala is an associate in the firm’s Labor & Employment Group where she helps clients meet their business objectives and minimize liability through the effective application of labor and employment laws. Her practice ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Artificial Intelligence
- Wage & Hour
- Discrimination
- Labor Law
- Harassment
- EEOC
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Department of Labor
- Coronavirus
- NLRB
- Compliance
- OSHA
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Title VII
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Religion Discrimination
- FLSA
- Supreme Court
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- National Labor Relations Board
- Privacy
- Diversity
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Arbitration
- Department of Homeland Security
- Federal Trade Commission
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- FMLA
- Employment Litigation
- Overtime Pay
- Workplace Accommodations
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Social Media
- Medical Marijuana
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Whistleblower
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis