Immigration enforcement by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has recently increased. Taking a proactive approach could help employers prepare to face immigration enforcement actions, such as raids or I-9 audits, and mitigate employer risks. The first step is for employers to understand and familiarize themselves with the differences between ICE audits and raids.
What is Form I-9 - Employment Eligibility Verification?
All U.S. employers are required to complete Form I-9 - Employment Eligibility Verification to verify the identity and work authorization of every individual hired for employment in the United States, whether they are US citizens or foreign nationals.
What is an ICE Audit?
An ICE audit is an inspection by authorized government officials to determine an employer’s compliance with employment eligibility laws, such as Form I-9 verifications.
Officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Department of Labor (DOL) possess authority to inspect employers’ Form I-9 records. Prior to an ICE audit, an employer will generally receive a written Notice of Inspection at least 3 days before the inspection is to occur. Officials generally choose where they will conduct a Form I-9 inspection. For example, officials may ask that an employer bring all or requested Form I-9 records to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office, or they may arrange for an inspection onsite.
When officials arrive to inspect an employer’s Form I-9 records, the employer must be prepared to retrieve and reproduce electronically stored records and any other documents the officer requests. Employers who violate the law may be subject to civil fines and/or criminal penalties (typically imposed when there is a pattern or practice of violations).
What is an ICE Raid?
Unlike ICE audits, raids are unannounced, and thus far more disruptive to the workplace. Raids target unauthorized workers or suspected illegal hiring practices. During a raid, ICE agents arrive at the worksite and surround the premises, monitoring all exits and entrances. The goal is to identify, detain, and arrest unauthorized workers at a worksite.
What should Employers Do?
Employers may take the following steps prior to an audit and raid:
- Contact your employment/immigration counsel.
- Perform an internal I-9 audit to ensure compliance with the law. Such internal audits help employers identify and correct any violations prior to an ICE audit or raid.
- Train HR professionals to ensure that they are up to date with recent changes.
- Provide Form I-9 training to ensure compliance with immigration and record retention.
- Use E-Verify to improve compliance with work authorization verification.
- Speak to counsel regarding substantive or technical violations.
- Create an ICE raid action plan. Have a plan for how your business will respond to a potential ICE raid.
- Brief leadership, managers, and HR personnel on basic legal rights and internal protocols for handling law enforcement visits.
- Educate employees regarding their rights during a raid.
During an ICE raid, employers should:
- Always remain calm, polite, respectful, and cooperative.
- Stay calm and request identification. Politely ask ICE agents for their official credentials, noting names and badge numbers.
- Request any warrant or official documentation that specifies the scope of the search.
- Review the warrant’s scope.
- Contact legal counsel immediately.
- Protect your employees. Reassure staff that they may request a lawyer.
- Document the encounter.
- Take appropriate follow-up steps after any visit from ICE.
- Communicate with employees. Provide updates and clarity on what occurred and what they should do moving forward.
- Handle all follow-up with ICE through your attorney.
Cooperate with ICE officials. Remind employees not to interfere with the raid.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
ADVERTISING MATERIAL.
© 2025 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
- Partner
John Milligan practices in the firm’s Labor & Employment Group where he regularly counsels clients as to best labor and employment practices, litigation avoidance, dispute resolution techniques, records retention, contract ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Religion Discrimination
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Labor Law
- Employer Rules
- Discrimination
- Wage & Hour
- EEOC
- Coronavirus
- Department of Labor
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- NLRB
- Artificial Intelligence
- Title VII
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Workplace Violence
- OSHA
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Compliance
- Worker Classification
- FLSA
- Department of Justice
- National Labor Relations Board
- Supreme Court
- NLRA
- Privacy
- Harassment
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Diversity
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Overtime Pay
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Litigation
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- Whistleblower
- Federal Arbitration Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- Ohio “Mini-WARN” Act Now In Effect: Key Compliance Takeaways for Employers
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price
- One Tweet Away From Trouble: Social Media at Work
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
