Over the past week, the number of confirmed cases of Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States has more than doubled. Most employers are considering measures to help them navigate the impact of Coronavirus in the workplace. The problem employers face is that employment laws were simply not written with scenarios like the Coronavirus crisis in mind. For example, OSHA’s general duty clause requires that employers furnish their employees a workplace that is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. An employer might conclude that this obligation requires close monitoring of employee heath to avoid spreading the Coronavirus in the workplace. However, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits employers from making disability related inquiries and requiring medical exams of employees absent a reasonable belief that an employee’s medical condition poses a “direct threat” to the workplace, creating a “business necessity.” These rules would be relaxed if a health agency such as the CDC declared the Coronavirus a pandemic, but that has not happened to date. As a result, employers are placed in an uncertain situation and the reality is that there is no completely risk free way to approach this issue.
Every workplace is different but in general, employers should consider the following:
1. Promote Sanitary Practices.
Maintain a hygienic working environment by performing routine cleaning. Post reminders to wash hands thoroughly and monitor supply levels of hand soaps and hand sanitizers to reduce the spread of germs.
2. Encourage Employees to Call in Sick.
Encourage employees to stay home when they are ill. Employees who appear to have acute respiratory illness symptoms should be separated from other employees and sent home immediately. Consider temporary revisions to attendance and PTO policies and evaluate options for working from home. The CDC encourages employers to forego requiring doctor’s notes from employees who have an acute respiratory illness. Employers should consider whether this approach is suitable in their workplaces.
3. Travel Restrictions.
Employers are free to restrict or suspend business related travel, particularly where alternatives such as teleconferencing are feasible. Employers may advise employees of the risks of travelling to destinations that have experienced a significant outbreak or substantial number of confirmed cases of Coronavirus and may request that returning employees stay home for the Coronavirus incubation period (currently identified as a 14 days). Again, exceptions may need to be made to attendance and PTO policies. Some employers are considering whether to pay employees during quarantine periods. Employers must also consider how their approach is impacted by their leave policies and applicable laws.
4. Employee Refusals to Work.
OSHA allows employees to refuse to come to work if they have a good faith belief that they will be exposed to a dangerous condition and the danger of death or serious injury is imminent. This will be a case-by-case analysis but in most workplaces in the United States, the imminent requirement is not likely met at present.
5. Prepare a Plan.
Given the fluid nature of this situation, it makes sense for employers to assemble a team to consider the best approach to the Coronavirus in their workplaces. Depending on the size of the organization, the team may include, where applicable, managers with responsibility for operations, human resources, legal, information technology and compliance. Topics to address include:
- Workplace safety measures;
- Employee travel and travel restrictions;
- Attendance and leave policies;
- Quarantine measures;
- Reporting and employee privacy;
- Facility shutdowns;
- Employee communication and assistance;
- Communication with federal, state and local healthcare agencies.
As with any guidance related to infectious illnesses and disease outbreaks, best practice measures are subject to updates as circumstances change or develop. If you need assistance with this issue, please contact a member of our Labor & Employment Group.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
© 2020 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
Mark Chumley has experience representing management in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims ...
Melanie Cheek is an associate in the firm’s Labor & Employment Group where she helps clients meet their business objectives and minimize liability. Her practice currently includes a wide range of labor and employment matters.
- Labor & Employment Law
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employment Law
- Race Discrimination
- Department of Labor
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Policies
- Labor Law
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Employer Handbook
- Employment Litigation
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Social Media
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Wage & Hour
- Workplace Accommodations
- Securities Law
- Title VII
- Sexual Harassment
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Employer Rules
- Transgender Issues
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Workplace Violence
- Sixth Circuit
- Disability Discrimination
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Religion Discrimination
- Department of Justice
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Privacy Laws
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Healthcare Reform
- Electronically Stored Information
- Affirmative Action
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Compensable Time
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- American Medical Association
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Contact Tracing - Considerations for Employers
- Supreme Court Rules Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Protected Under Title VII
- COVID-19 Related RIFs - Considerations for Employers
- Benefits Monthly Minute UPDATE: Hot-Off the (Electronic) Press! DOL Issues New E-Disclosure Rules
- Should Employers Use COVID-19 Antibody Tests?
- NEW COVID-19 Guidance For 125 Plans and HRA Premium Expense Reimbursement
- IRS Q&As Address Open Questions on CARES Act CRD and Loan Administration
- What Should Employers Do About Employees Who Refuse to Return to Work?
- Reopen Ohio Guidance for Employers
- COVID-19 and Trade Secrets