When I attend holiday cocktail parties, people often ask me employment law questions. They ask other questions as well, like why would someone invite a lawyer to a cocktail party — such dull company. I can’t answer that one but here is a more topical question — what is the one best thing an employer can do to protect itself from disastrous employment litigation? My answer is to start an arbitration program for your workplace.
I won’t bore you with a lengthy recitation of the law of arbitration in the non-union workplace over the past couple of decades. Suffice it to say that it is entirely possible to craft a fully enforceable arbitration agreement that requires employees to submit every dispute they could otherwise file in court to arbitration. This is a tremendous coup for the employer because it eliminates the possibility of a jury trial. Instead of a jury that would feel sorry for the employee and assume that the employer has millions of dollars to give away, the case must be tried to an arbitrator who has experience in employment law. This means that the employee will actually have to prove not only the asserted claims but his or her damages as well.
Of course, this is no guarantee of victory for the employer but it certainly reduces the possibility of a runaway jury awarding an employee an exorbitant amount of damages. Also, in general, arbitration is somewhat less expensive and less protracted than litigation in court. As an extra bonus, plaintiffs’ attorneys often lose interest in a case when the possibility of a jury trial is removed.
A great deal of my practice is devoted to arbitration of employment law claims. Frankly, I am amazed that more employers do not use arbitration, considering the advantages it offers.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Wage & Hour
- Artificial Intelligence
- Labor Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Department of Labor
- Coronavirus
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Harassment
- OSHA
- Title VII
- Compliance
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Religion Discrimination
- FLSA
- Department of Justice
- Supreme Court
- NLRA
- National Labor Relations Board
- Privacy
- Diversity
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Arbitration
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Federal Trade Commission
- FMLA
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Employment Litigation
- Workplace Accommodations
- Overtime Pay
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Social Media
- Medical Marijuana
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- Whistleblower
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Paycheck Protection Program
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis