I recently wrote about OSHA’s plan to develop and distribute information to ensure transgender employees have safe and adequate access to workplace restrooms. This week, OSHA issued “Best Practices - A Guide to Restroom Access for Transgender Workers,” with the stated Core Principle that “[a]ll employees, including transgender employees, should have access to restrooms that correspond to their gender identity.” The OSHA Guide notes the following:
- An estimated 700,000 adults in the United States are transgender - meaning their internal gender
- Identity is different from the sex they were assigned at birth (e.g., the sex listed on their birth certificate)
- Restricting employees to using only restrooms that are not consistent with their gender identity, or segregating them from other workers by requiring them to use gender-neutral or other specific restrooms, singles those employees out and may make them fear for their physical safety.
- Under OSHA’s Sanitation standard (1910.141), employers are required to provide their employees with toilet facilities.
As for Best Practices, they include:
-
[A]ll employees should be permitted to use the facilities that correspond with their gender identity.
-
The employee should determine the most appropriate and safest option for him- or herself.
-
The best policies also provide additional options, which employees may choose, but are not required, to use such as single -occupancy gender-neutral (unisex) facilities and multiple-occupant, gender-neutral restroom facilities with lockable single occupant stalls.
-
Regardless of the physical layout of a worksite, all employers need to find solutions that are safe and convenient and respect transgender employees.
The OSHA guidance goes on to note that employees are not asked to provide any medical or legal documentation of their gender identity in order to have access to gender-appropriate facilities. Also, no employee should be required to use a segregated facility apart from other employees because of their gender identity or transgender status. Finally, employees generally may not be limited to using facilities that are an unreasonable distance or travel time from the employee’s worksite.
While these are being presented as “Best Practices,” the reference to the Sanitation standard as well as the listing of federal, state and local laws that reaffirm the principle of providing employees with access to restroom facilities based on gender identification make clear the direction OSHA is heading. Employers would be wise to plan ahead to address these issues proactively.
- Partner
Mark Chumley has experience representing management in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has handled numerous cases before state and federal courts and state and federal civil rights agencies, including claims ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Arbitration
- Coronavirus
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Discrimination
- Disability Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- IRS
- OSHA
- Department of Labor
- NLRB
- Employer Policies
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Litigation
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Retirement
- Social Media
- Accommodation
- ERISA
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Employer Handbook
- Employment Litigation
- Reasonable Accommodation
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Wage & Hour
- NLRA
- EEOC
- ADAAA
- Title VII
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Unions
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- 401(k)
- Technology
- Transgender Issues
- Workplace Accommodations
- Privacy
- FMLA
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Disability
- Workplace Violence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Securities Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Religion Discrimination
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Benefits
- Overtime Pay
- Representative Election Regulations
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Department of Justice
- Privacy Laws
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Electronically Stored Information
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Future of Arbitration
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: The Gig Economy
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update Week of 3/7/2022
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Labor & Employment Law Update Week of 2/7/2022
- Supreme Court Re-Implements Stay of Vaccine Mandate for Employers, Upholds CMS Mandate
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Twelve Thoughts About Vaccine Mandates
- Update on Status of Federal Contractor Mandate and OSHA’s ETS
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Employment Law Advice from Ebenezer Scrooge
- Update on Status of All Federal Vaccine Mandates
- The Practical Employment Law Podcast: Federal Vaccine Mandate(s) Update