I recently wrote about OSHA’s plan to develop and distribute information to ensure transgender employees have safe and adequate access to workplace restrooms. This week, OSHA issued “Best Practices - A Guide to Restroom Access for Transgender Workers,” with the stated Core Principle that “[a]ll employees, including transgender employees, should have access to restrooms that correspond to their gender identity.” The OSHA Guide notes the following:
- An estimated 700,000 adults in the United States are transgender - meaning their internal gender
- Identity is different from the sex they were assigned at birth (e.g., the sex listed on their birth certificate)
- Restricting employees to using only restrooms that are not consistent with their gender identity, or segregating them from other workers by requiring them to use gender-neutral or other specific restrooms, singles those employees out and may make them fear for their physical safety.
- Under OSHA’s Sanitation standard (1910.141), employers are required to provide their employees with toilet facilities.
As for Best Practices, they include:
-
[A]ll employees should be permitted to use the facilities that correspond with their gender identity.
-
The employee should determine the most appropriate and safest option for him- or herself.
-
The best policies also provide additional options, which employees may choose, but are not required, to use such as single -occupancy gender-neutral (unisex) facilities and multiple-occupant, gender-neutral restroom facilities with lockable single occupant stalls.
-
Regardless of the physical layout of a worksite, all employers need to find solutions that are safe and convenient and respect transgender employees.
The OSHA guidance goes on to note that employees are not asked to provide any medical or legal documentation of their gender identity in order to have access to gender-appropriate facilities. Also, no employee should be required to use a segregated facility apart from other employees because of their gender identity or transgender status. Finally, employees generally may not be limited to using facilities that are an unreasonable distance or travel time from the employee’s worksite.
While these are being presented as “Best Practices,” the reference to the Sanitation standard as well as the listing of federal, state and local laws that reaffirm the principle of providing employees with access to restroom facilities based on gender identification make clear the direction OSHA is heading. Employers would be wise to plan ahead to address these issues proactively.
Topics/Tags
Select- Employment Law
- Labor & Employment Law
- Discrimination
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- EEOC
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor
- Supreme Court
- Title VII
- Compliance
- NLRB
- Coronavirus
- Workplace Violence
- FLSA
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Department of Justice
- Religion Discrimination
- Reasonable Accommodation
- NLRA
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Diversity
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Federal Trade Commission
- Overtime Pay
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employment Litigation
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Unions
- Whistleblower
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- United States Supreme Court
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis
- The Independent Contractor Tug-of-War: Navigating the Latest DOL Shifts
- ICE Raids and Audits – What’s an Employer to Do
- New Online Registration Requirements for Foreign Nationals
- Workplace Violence: Are You Taking Required Steps to Protect Your Employees?
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?