The widely discussed Bruce Jenner interview has been a media sensation but for employers there are more important recent stories on transgender issues in the workplace. Last month, the EEOC issued a ruling that Title VII was violated by the Army when it refused to allow a transgender, male-to-female, civilian employee to use the women’s common restroom. The employee had met with Army supervisors and discussed her transition from male-to-female, agreeing to a written plan that would allow use of a single-user restroom rather than the women’s’ common restroom, at least until the employee had completed the surgical transition process. On a few occasions when the single-user restroom was unavailable, the employee elected to use the women’s common restroom and was confronted by supervisors for making other employees uncomfortable. There were also allegations of the employee being referred to by “sir” or a male name.
The EEOC concluded:
In summary, we find that Complainant proved that she was subjected to disparate treatment on the basis of sex when she was denied equal access to the common female restroom facilities. We further find that the Agency is liable for subjecting Complainant to a hostile work environment based on sex by preventing her from using the common female restroom facilities and allowing a team leader intentionally and repeatedly to refer to her by male names and pronouns and make hostile remarks well after he was aware that Complainant's gender identity was female.
One news outlet critical of the EEOC’s decision has reported:
According to someone who is very well informed about the EEOC, the EEOC issued the decision because it has filed suits against employers about transgender employees and plans to file more very soon, and it wants its litigators to be able to cite something as legal support for its adventuresome claims.
It is certainly accurate that claims by transgender employees are becoming more common. Links to examples are here and here.
This week, OSHA and the National Center for Transgender Equality announced that they have entered into a partnership to develop and distribute information to ensure transgender employees have safe and adequate access to workplace restrooms. The stated purpose of the alliance is to provide “information, guidance, and access to OSHA resources that will help . . . protect the health and safety of workers, particularly by: (1) helping to ensure adequate access to workplace restrooms, and (2) understanding the rights of workers and the responsibilities of employers under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act).” Some state legislatures have weighed in as well, most recently Utah, which passed a law requiring restroom accommodation for transgender employees.
Employers would be well advised to prepare themselves to deal with transgender employees’ issues if they have not already done so. In light of the EEOC’s recent decision, the go to solution of providing a separate restroom may not be adequate. Employers should consult with experienced counsel who can assist with crafting a plan that takes into account employee needs, corporate culture, available facilities and other relevant factors.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- Labor Law
- Wage & Hour
- FMLA
- NLRB
- EEOC
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- FLSA
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Discrimination
- Sexual Harassment
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Holiday Policies
- Coronavirus
- Sixth Circuit
- Social Media
- Title VII
- Employer Policies
- Transgender Issues
- Religion Discrimination
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Rules
- Diversity
- Overtime Pay
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Privacy
- Department of Justice
- Paid Leave Laws
- NLRA
- Compliance
- Tax Credit
- Supreme Court
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Workplace Accommodations
- Federal Trade Commission
- Worker Classification
- Litigation
- IRS
- Harassment
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Medical Marijuana
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Whistleblower
- Disability
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Securities Law
- Privacy Laws
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
- EEO-1 Reporting on the Chopping Block: What Employers Need to Know
- DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
- Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for Future Compliance
- New Requirements for Employers in California
- Back to the Office: The EEOC Clarifies the Limits of Telework Under the ADA
- EEOC Rescinds Anti-Harassment Guidance Addressing Transgender Protections
- The EEOC’s Renewed Focus on Employer DEI Programs in 2026