The D.C. Circuit holds that President Obama’s January 2012 recess appointments to the NLRB were unconstitutional, arguably undermining the precedential value of controversial decisions of 2012. (Noel Canning v. NLRB, January 25, 2013.) This panel of the D.C. Circuit agreed with the technical definition of “Recess” advanced by the Employer, finding that the Senate was not in recess at the time three members of the Board were appointed on January 4, 2012. The President’s recess appointments to the Board were therefore invalid. Consequently, the Board lacked a necessary quorum of three members and was not authorized to conduct business on the day it issued the challenged ruling. With the possibility of an en banc review by the D.C. Circuit, it is probably premature to expect the Obama administration to appoint moderate members to achieve a working quorum.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- EEOC
- FMLA
- Transgender Issues
- Discrimination
- Diversity
- Social Media
- Title VII
- Coronavirus
- Employer Policies
- Religion Discrimination
- Employment Litigation
- Department of Labor
- Wage & Hour
- Overtime Pay
- Employer Rules
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Paid Leave Laws
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Artificial Intelligence
- OSHA
- Tax Credit
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- National Labor Relations Board
- FLSA
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Department of Justice
- Privacy
- Compliance
- NLRA
- Supreme Court
- Arbitration
- Worker Classification
- Federal Trade Commission
- Harassment
- Workplace Accommodations
- Litigation
- IRS
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- EEOC Rescinds Anti-Harassment Guidance Addressing Transgender Protections
- The EEOC’s Renewed Focus on Employer DEI Programs in 2026
- The Commute Counts: DOL Confirms FMLA Leave Extends to Travel Time
- Expansion of State Paid Leave Laws in 2026
- Work Opportunity Tax Credit At Risk: Use It Before You Lose It
- IRS Releases Additional Guidance on New Tip and Overtime Tax Deductions for 2025
- EEOC Takes Aim at Perceived Anti-American Bias
- Ohio “Mini-WARN” Act Now In Effect: Key Compliance Takeaways for Employers
- EEOC's Renewed Focus on Religious Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price