On May 7, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) rule requiring both union and non-union employers to display posters informing employees of their right to form a union and engage in other concerted activity.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the NLRB rule was a violation of both the National Labor Relations Act’s (“NLRA”) “free speech” provision and the 1st Amendment of the Constitution. The majority opinion relied primarily on Section 8(c) of the NLRA, the so-called "free speech" provision which allows employers to advise employees of their view on unions as long as it is done in a non-coercive manner. In sum, the court held that the NLRB rule violated employers’ free speech rights by forcing them to display the posters or face charges of committing an unfair labor practice.
The NLRB adopted a rule in August 2011 that required millions of private employers to post a notice alerting employees to their rights under the NLRA, including their right to act together to improve wages and working conditions, to form, join and assist a union, to bargain collectively with their employer, and to choose not to do any of these activities.
The federal appeals court called the NLRB position hypocrisy because an employer’s failure to post the notice would be an unfair labor practice, despite the NLRA’s preservation and protection of the right of employers (and unions) not to speak.
The D.C. Circuit is not the first to reject the NLRB’s poster rule. In April 2012, a federal trial judge in South Carolina also ruled that the NLRB had no authority to require such a poster, a ruling currently being appealed by the NLRB to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
The full opinion is available here.
- Of Counsel
Caroline Musekamp's practice is concentrated in the area of labor and employment law. Caroline advises employers on developing compliant employment policies and handbooks to avoid employment claims and minimize liability ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- EEOC
- Department of Labor
- Discrimination
- FMLA
- Labor Law
- Affirmative Action
- Wage & Hour
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Immigration
- Coronavirus
- Diversity
- Social Media
- FLSA
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Sexual Harassment
- Employer Policies
- Title VII
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Litigation
- Religion Discrimination
- Transgender Issues
- Employer Rules
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- National Enforcement Plan
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Overtime Pay
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- OSHA
- Holiday Policies
- Privacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Department of Justice
- NLRA
- Compliance
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Supreme Court
- Workplace Accommodations
- Paid Leave Laws
- Federal Trade Commission
- Litigation
- Tax Credit
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- IRS
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- Medical Marijuana
- National Labor Relations Act
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Employer Handbook
- ADAAA
- ERISA
- Race Discrimination
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Disability
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Environmental Law
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- EEOC Proposes Overhaul of Federal Workplace Discrimination Complaint Process
- OFCCP Publishes Final Rules Reducing Federal Contractor Affirmative Action Obligations
- US Court of Appeals puts $100,000 H-1B Fee on Hold Again
- Asking Is Protected: Sixth Circuit Expands FMLA Retaliation Protections
- New DHS Rule Will Restrict Student Periods of Admission from Duration of Status to Fixed End Date
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
- EEO-1 Reporting on the Chopping Block: What Employers Need to Know
- DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know
