It’s been a while since I have posted a Labor Law Movie Review and watching 9 to 5 is not something that will make me jump at the chance to do these more regularly. A little too over the top campy for my tastes, but it does provide some interesting historical perspective. The film was released in 1980 and depicts a workplace that gives hostile environments of today a good name. The plot is actually pretty detailed but here are the basics (Warning – Spoilers):
The film is centered on three women who work in the offices of Consolidated, a company in Chicago. Judy (Jane Fonda) is a new employee whose husband recently left her. Violet (Lily Tomlin) is the supervisor of her department and a longtime employee of Consolidated; she has been passed over repeatedly for promotions. The boss, Franklin Hart (Dabney Coleman), is a sexist monster. The third woman is Doralee (Dolly Parton), Hart's personal secretary. Although Doralee is married, Hart continually makes lewd advances. Hart also tells co-workers that he's been having an affair with Doralee, making her the topic of office gossip. When Violet complains to Hart that he passed her over for a promotion because she is a woman, Hart tells her that the company would rather have a man in the position. Doralee learns that everyone thinks she is having an affair with Hart and Judy witnesses a co-worker lose her job over a minor issue. As a result, all three women are angry at Hart. Through a series of improbable events, the trio kidnap Hart and hold him in his own house while they run the department their way with positive results. Of course, everything works out in the end and Hart gets his comeuppance.
The workplace depicted in 9 to 5 is so over the top that it does not really lend itself to an analysis under today’s employment laws. In fact, the most interesting aspect of the movie is the absence of employment law as factor in the workplace. Recall that Title VII was passed in 1964 and prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender. However, it was not until 1986 that the Supreme Court decided Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, recognizing sexual harassment as a violation of Title VII and establishing the severe or pervasive test that is so familiar today. Thus, when 9 to 5 was filmed, sexual harassment litigation was uncommon if not unheard of by most people. If nothing else, the current obsession with resolving workplace disputes in the courts avoids the need to self help remedies, such as the one contemplated by Doralee early in the movie:
Look, I've got a gun out there in my purse. Up until now I've been forgivin' and forgettin' because of the way I was brought up, but I'll tell you one thing. If you ever say another word about me or make another indecent proposal, I'm gonna get that gun of mine, and I'm gonna change you from a rooster to a hen with one shot! And don't think I can't do it.
Also of interest are the changes made by the women while they are holding the boss hostage. Many of their improvements are things that actually came to pass, e.g. job sharing and flex time. I give this movie high marks for labor law content since it is all about the workplace but there is no legal accuracy to evaluate since the law is simply not part of the story.
Finally, the theme song is catchy but the lyrics read like a socialist tract:
It's a rich mans game
No matter what they call it
And you spend your life
Puttin’ money in his wallet
Great – now it’s stuck in my head.
Labor Law Content **** (out of five)
Labor Law Accuracy N/A (out of five)
As always, I welcome your comments. You'll find a link to my email address at the CONTACT line below.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Employment Law
- Department of Labor
- Department of Justice
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Workplace Violence
- NLRB
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Religion Discrimination
- Title VII
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Coronavirus
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Diversity
- NLRA
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- FLSA
- Overtime Pay
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- FMLA
- Arbitration
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employment Litigation
- IRS
- Litigation
- Medical Marijuana
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ADAAA
- Whistleblower
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- United States Supreme Court
- Employer Rules
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Environmental Law
- SECURE Act
- Privacy Laws
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- ICE Raids and Audits – What’s an Employer to Do
- New Online Registration Requirements for Foreign Nationals
- Workplace Violence: Are You Taking Required Steps to Protect Your Employees?
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?
- EEOC Targets 20 Large Law Firms regarding DEI related Employment Practices
- Ohio Senate Bill 11: Key Provisions and Implications for Employers
- Shifting Burdens: Is McDonnell Douglas Past Its Prime?
- Uncertain Ground: The NLRB, EEOC, and the Fallout of Presidential Firings
- UPDATED: What’s Next for the Department of Labor? The Confirmation of Lori Chávez-DeRemer
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Where Things Stand in Response to Actions Taken by President Trump