What do Rolling Stone magazine and the United States Senate have in common? They’re both talking about the discrimination faced by individuals with non-conforming gender identity.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday that before Thanksgiving, the Senate will consider the long-awaited Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would put a nationwide ban on workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The same bill has been introduced numerous times but never made it to the president's desk. Many are hoping that the current political climate – evidenced by the U.S. Supreme Court’s historic same-sex marriage decision in June – will enable the bill to pass providing federal protections for those in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community.
Workplace protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees are not really new, but they don't currently exist under federal law. Numerous states have enacted laws banning employment bias based on sexual orientation or gender identity. As of April, 88 percent of Fortune 500 companies had nondiscrimination policies that covered sexual orientation, and 57 percent had policies that included gender identity, according to a statement from Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa.
The issue of gender identity and sexual orientation has become unavoidable as shown by Rolling Stone’s article, “About a Girl: Coy Mathis’ Fight to Change Gender,” which focuses on the issues raised by gender dysphoria among the nation’s youth. This is an issue that polarizes communities, challenges school districts, and pervades the workplace. So, at long last – the bill having been introduced in every congressional session except once since 1994 – employers and others may see guidance in the form of a federal statute providing anti-discrimination protections for LGBT individuals.Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Rules
- Wage & Hour
- Labor Law
- Discrimination
- EEOC
- Worker Classification
- Department of Labor
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Artificial Intelligence
- Coronavirus
- NLRB
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Title VII
- OSHA
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Compliance
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Religion Discrimination
- Harassment
- FLSA
- Department of Justice
- Supreme Court
- National Labor Relations Board
- NLRA
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Diversity
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Federal Trade Commission
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Workplace Accommodations
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Overtime Pay
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Whistleblower
- Technology
- Sexual Harassment
- United States Supreme Court
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Sixth Circuit
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Posting Requirements
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Telecommuting
- Compensable Time
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
Recent Posts
- No Free Delivery: Misclassification Comes at a Price
- One Tweet Away From Trouble: Social Media at Work
- Outsourcing Hiring Won’t Outsource Risk: Implications for Employers Using AI in Hiring
- No Intent, No Liability: Sixth Circuit Narrows Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment
- AI in Hiring: The Promise, the Pitfalls, and the Response
- Two Big Beautiful Tax Deductions: What Employers Need to Know
- OSHA’s Updated Inspection Program: What Employers Should Know and Expect
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA