As most employers are aware, the definition of what constitutes a “disability” for purposes of providing a reasonable workplace accommodation was broadened significantly with the enactment of the Americans with Disability Act Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA). Among other changes, conditions must now be assessed without consideration of mitigating measures such as medication, and episodic conditions must be considered in light of limiting affects when active even if an employee is currently in remission. Although these amendments substantially expanded what the courts viewed as a “disability” under the Americans with Disabilities Act, some courts maintained that obesity, quickly becoming an epidemic in the United States, did not meet the definition of a disability without the presence of other effects such as hypertension or diabetes, or a separate underlying cause such as Cushing’s disease.
On June 18th, the American Medical Association voted during its annual meeting to adopt a policy regarding obesity as a disease. This shift in how the medical community views and treats obesity may translate into additional obligations under the ADA for employers. While the true impact remains to be seen, employers should proceed carefully in assessing requests for accommodation from obese employees even where no other related condition or cause is present. Such requests may include modified furniture or equipment, different work areas, more doctors’ visits (also implicating the FMLA), and additional time to perform certain work functions.
In anticipation of these requests, it is advisable for employers to revisit job descriptions and tighten their essential job functions lists. And, although the official designation of obesity as a disease marks what may be a paradigm shift for the medical community and employers alike, in the end employers should treat accommodations for obese employees in the same way they handle accommodations for employees with other conditions. Requested accommodations should be assessed on an individual basis, and some accommodations may be simple and easy to provide such as rearranging workspace lay out or improving ergonomics. Where requested accommodations involve greater effort or expense, an employer is entitled to request medical information and analyze whether the condition rises to the level of a “disability,” but at all times the employer should be sensitive and discreet when addressing workplace concerns.
Topics/Tags
Select- EEOC
- Employment Law
- Immigration
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor
- Diversity
- Wage & Hour
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Discrimination
- FLSA
- Coronavirus
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Social Media
- Sexual Harassment
- National Enforcement Plan
- Sixth Circuit
- Employer Policies
- Title VII
- Employment Litigation
- Transgender Issues
- Religion Discrimination
- Employer Rules
- Holiday Policies
- Overtime Pay
- Workplace Violence
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- OSHA
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Artificial Intelligence
- Privacy
- Department of Justice
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- NLRA
- Compliance
- Paid Leave Laws
- Supreme Court
- Tax Credit
- Workplace Accommodations
- Federal Trade Commission
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- Litigation
- IRS
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Disability Discrimination
- Department of Homeland Security
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Medical Marijuana
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- ADAAA
- ERISA
- Race Discrimination
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Disability
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- 401(k)
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Privacy Laws
- Securities Law
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Electronically Stored Information
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Security Screening
- Telecommuting
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Classification
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Misclassification
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- State Minimum Wage
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- Wage Increase
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
- Antitrust
- FMLA
- Labor & Employment Law
Recent Posts
- Asking Is Protected: Sixth Circuit Expands FMLA Retaliation Protections
- New DHS Rule Will Restrict Student Periods of Admission from Duration of Status to Fixed End Date
- TPS Haiti Termination: How Employers Can Ensure I-9 Records Remain Compliant
- A New Enforcement Era: What Employers Should Know About the EEOC’s 2025–2029 National Enforcement Plan
- Beyond Paid Time Off: The Legal Side of Holiday Policies
- EEO-1 Reporting on the Chopping Block: What Employers Need to Know
- DOL Proposes New Joint Employer Rule: What Employers Need to Know
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
- Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for Future Compliance