As most employers are aware, the definition of what constitutes a “disability” for purposes of providing a reasonable workplace accommodation was broadened significantly with the enactment of the Americans with Disability Act Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA). Among other changes, conditions must now be assessed without consideration of mitigating measures such as medication, and episodic conditions must be considered in light of limiting affects when active even if an employee is currently in remission. Although these amendments substantially expanded what the courts viewed as a “disability” under the Americans with Disabilities Act, some courts maintained that obesity, quickly becoming an epidemic in the United States, did not meet the definition of a disability without the presence of other effects such as hypertension or diabetes, or a separate underlying cause such as Cushing’s disease.
On June 18th, the American Medical Association voted during its annual meeting to adopt a policy regarding obesity as a disease. This shift in how the medical community views and treats obesity may translate into additional obligations under the ADA for employers. While the true impact remains to be seen, employers should proceed carefully in assessing requests for accommodation from obese employees even where no other related condition or cause is present. Such requests may include modified furniture or equipment, different work areas, more doctors’ visits (also implicating the FMLA), and additional time to perform certain work functions.
In anticipation of these requests, it is advisable for employers to revisit job descriptions and tighten their essential job functions lists. And, although the official designation of obesity as a disease marks what may be a paradigm shift for the medical community and employers alike, in the end employers should treat accommodations for obese employees in the same way they handle accommodations for employees with other conditions. Requested accommodations should be assessed on an individual basis, and some accommodations may be simple and easy to provide such as rearranging workspace lay out or improving ergonomics. Where requested accommodations involve greater effort or expense, an employer is entitled to request medical information and analyze whether the condition rises to the level of a “disability,” but at all times the employer should be sensitive and discreet when addressing workplace concerns.
Topics/Tags
Select- Labor & Employment Law
- Employment Law
- Labor Law
- NLRB
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board
- EEOC
- Department of Labor
- Sexual Harassment
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Sixth Circuit
- Reasonable Accommodation
- Discrimination
- FMLA
- FLSA
- Social Media
- Coronavirus
- Transgender Issues
- Title VII
- Employer Policies
- Diversity
- Religion Discrimination
- Wage & Hour
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Rules
- Overtime Pay
- Independent Contractor
- Joint Employer
- Telework
- Workplace Violence
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Non-Compete Agreements
- OSHA
- Artificial Intelligence
- Paid Leave Laws
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Privacy
- Department of Justice
- Tax Credit
- Compliance
- Employee Tips
- One Big Beautiful Bill
- NLRA
- Supreme Court
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Accommodations
- Worker Classification
- Harassment
- Litigation
- IRS
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Medical Marijuana
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- Race Discrimination
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Unions
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Technology
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Whistleblower
- United States Supreme Court
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Securities Law
- Privacy Laws
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Health Savings Account
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Healthcare Reform
- Representative Election Regulations
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- Arbitration Agreements Take a Hit: What the Sixth Circuit's EFAA Decision Means for Your Workplace Agreements
- Bourbon, Ballots, and Bargaining Orders: Sixth Circuit Rejects NLRB’s Cemex Framework
- Independent Contractor and Joint Employer Rules: Looking to the Past for Future Compliance
- New Requirements for Employers in California
- Back to the Office: The EEOC Clarifies the Limits of Telework Under the ADA
- EEOC Rescinds Anti-Harassment Guidance Addressing Transgender Protections
- The EEOC’s Renewed Focus on Employer DEI Programs in 2026
- The Commute Counts: DOL Confirms FMLA Leave Extends to Travel Time
- Expansion of State Paid Leave Laws in 2026
- Work Opportunity Tax Credit At Risk: Use It Before You Lose It