Most people have heard the news by now. Gen. Stanley McChrystal was relieved of his command of international forces in Afghanistan after his disparaging remarks about the Obama administration were published in Rolling Stone. I had not intended to comment on this story, but so many people have asked me my opinion (offline) that I decided to blog about it. Upon reflection, the story does have some application to labor and employment law issues. In fact, I have decided to coin a new term for use in the employment law context — a “McChrystal.”
A “McChrystal” occurs when an employee publicly disparages or criticizes their employer and/or boss. In my experience, this occurs with alarming frequency, particularly via social media. What is amazing is how often employees are surprised that their “McChrystal” is discovered by their employer and even indignant about being held accountable for it. Sometimes the employee even suggests that their “McChrystal” was private, despite being published on Facebook or Twitter. Courts that have considered the issue disagree, generally holding that publicly accessible websites are just that — public. Thus, employees have not been successful in asserting invasion of privacy claims in these scenarios.
As for the response to a “McChrystal,” I have to agree with the Obama administration’s handling of the situation. A subordinate cannot be allowed to publicly disparage his or her supervisor without consequences. It undermines the ability to lead and on a very basic level calls into question the judgment of the subordinate. Of course, private sector employers need to consider potential retaliation claims, the circumstances in which the comments occurred and any applicable state laws. In general (pun), however, employers can demand that employees raise their complaints in an appropriate fashion and address the issue if they do not.
Topics/Tags
Select- Employment Law
- Labor & Employment Law
- Discrimination
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- EEOC
- Labor Law
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Department of Labor
- Supreme Court
- Title VII
- NLRB
- Coronavirus
- Workplace Violence
- Compliance
- FLSA
- Non-Compete Agreements
- Religion Discrimination
- Department of Justice
- Reasonable Accommodation
- NLRA
- Performance Improvement Plans
- Diversity
- Department of Homeland Security
- Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- Foreign Nationals
- Immigration and Nationality Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Wage & Hour
- Privacy
- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
- Federal Trade Commission
- Overtime Pay
- Artificial Intelligence
- Inclusion
- LGBTQ+
- Arbitration
- FMLA
- Workplace Accommodations
- Employment Litigation
- Litigation
- IRS
- Medical Marijuana
- Social Media
- Employer Policies
- Disability Discrimination
- Retirement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Accommodation
- Sexual Orientation Discrimination
- Race Discrimination
- Employer Handbook
- OSHA
- ERISA
- ADAAA
- Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
- Unions
- Whistleblower
- ACA
- Affordable Car Act
- Employer Rules
- United States Supreme Court
- Sexual Harassment
- Technology
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Transgender Issues
- Disability
- 401(k)
- Employment Settlement Agreements
- Sixth Circuit
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Benefits
- Gender Identity Discrimination
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Posting Requirements
- Class Action Litigation
- Disability Law
- E-Discovery
- Evidence
- Securities Law
- Environmental Law
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Health Savings Account
- Preventive Care Benefits
- Privacy Laws
- SECURE Act
- US Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration
- Representative Election Regulations
- Healthcare Reform
- Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA)
- Electronically Stored Information
- Telecommuting
- Affirmative Action
- Compensable Time
- Equal Opportunity Clause
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- Security Screening
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- ESI
- Unemployment Insurance Integrity Act
- American Medical Association
- Attendance Policy
- Return to Work
- Seniority Rights
- Classification
- Confidentiality
- Disability Leave
- Equal Pay
- Fair Minimum Wage
- Federal Minimum Wage
- Genetic Information Discrimination
- Media Policy
- Misclassification
- National Origin Discrimination
- Retaliation
- Social Media Content
- State Minimum Wage
- Wage Increase
- Antitrust
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Taxation
Recent Posts
- SCOTUS Lowers Bar for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- Revisiting ADA Compliance: Lessons from a Recent Court Decision
- Federal Court Strikes Down Part of EEOC Rule Requiring Accommodations for Elective Abortion Under the PWFA
- More on Equal Opportunity: Executive Order Seeks to End Disparate Impact Liability to promote Equal Opportunity
- PIP This: The Expansion of Actionable Adverse Employment Decisions in the Wake of Muldrow v. City of St. Louis
- The Independent Contractor Tug-of-War: Navigating the Latest DOL Shifts
- ICE Raids and Audits – What’s an Employer to Do
- New Online Registration Requirements for Foreign Nationals
- Workplace Violence: Are You Taking Required Steps to Protect Your Employees?
- EEOC & DOJ New Guidance on DEI-Related Discrimination: What Does it Mean for Employers?