On February 20, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued interpretive guidance to assist public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents. This guidance indicates that the SEC is expecting more robust cybersecurity-related disclosures in the filings of public companies and encourages companies to implement comprehensive cybersecurity policies and procedures.
Overview of Rules Requiring Disclosure of Cybersecurity Issues
The guidance states that companies should consider the following in disclosing cybersecurity-related risk factors:
- The occurrence of prior cybersecurity incidents, including their severity and frequency;
- The probability of the occurrence and potential magnitude of cybersecurity incidents;
- The adequacy of preventative actions taken to reduce cybersecurity risks and the associated costs, including, if appropriate, discussing the limits of the company’s ability to prevent or mitigate certain cybersecurity risks;
- The aspects of the company’s business and operations that give rise to material cybersecurity risks and the potential costs and consequences of such risks, including industry-specific risks and third party supplier and service provider risks;
- The costs associated with maintaining cybersecurity protections, including, if applicable, insurance coverage relating to cybersecurity incidents or payments to service providers
- The potential for reputational harm;
- Existing or pending laws and regulations that may affect the requirements to which companies are subject relating to cybersecurity and the associated costs to companies; and
- Litigation, regulatory investigation, and remediation costs associated with cybersecurity incidents.
The guidance suggests that companies in their MD&A disclosures should discuss cybersecurity efforts and the consequences, costs and risks of current and potential cybersecurity incidents, which may include the loss of intellectual property, maintenance of insurance, responses to litigation and regulatory actions, compliance with applicable legislation and implementation of remediation efforts.
Policies and Procedures
The guidance encourages companies to implement comprehensive cybersecurity policies and procedures and to evaluate compliance with applicable SEC and exchange regulations on a regular basis, including with respect to adequate disclosures. These procedures should enable senior management to make informed disclosure decisions including with respect to Regulation FD compliance, while at the same time prevent insider trading based on cybersecurity-related information. Furthermore, the procedures should not be entirely focused on required disclosures but should also allow for timely collection and review of all information that may be relevant to a cybersecurity-related disclosure.
The SEC has identified as a major concern insider trading on the basis of nonpublic information related to a company’s cybersecurity risk and incidents. In light of this increased awareness by the SEC, the guidance encourages companies to review their codes of ethics and insider trading policies to ensure insider trading on cybersecurity-related information is taken into account. These policies should include specific measures that prevent insider trading before disclosure of a cybersecurity-related incident.
The new SEC release can be found here.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
© 2023 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transaction ...
Jim Kennedy practices in the Business Representation & Transactions Group. The focus of his practice is corporate, securities, and financing law, where he has extensive experience in mergers, acquisitions and ...
Joe Callow, Litigation Partner
email@example.com or 513.579.6419
Rob Lesan, Business Representation & Transactions Partner
firstname.lastname@example.org or 513.579.6939
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Privacy Laws
- California Consumer Privacy Act
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Class Action Litigation
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Incident Response Plan
- Information Governance
- Corporate Law
- Federal Trade Commission
- Seventh Circuit
- Department of Justice
- GDPR Compliance: What is Privacy Shield 2.0?
- Connecticut's Data Privacy Law
- The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA)
- The Utah Consumer Privacy Act
- The Colorado Privacy Act
- The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act
- State Data Privacy Law Series
- TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez and the Impact on Class Action Litigation
- 2023: The Year of the CPRA and CDPA - Virginia Joins California in Passing Comprehensive Privacy Legislation
- Cybersecurity Remains a Top Concern