On October 25, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law a bill (the “Act”) banning the sale of over-the-counter weight loss and muscle building supplements to children under the age of 18. This Act is the first law in the United States to ban the sale of such supplements to children and is set to take effect in April of 2024.
Overview of the Act
The Act bans entities and individuals alike from selling, offering to sell, or giving away, as a retail or wholesale promotion, over-the-counter diet pills or dietary supplements for weight loss or muscle building within New York to any person under the age of 18. The supplements covered under the Act include supplements labeled, marketed, or otherwise represented to help achieve weight loss or muscle building (“Covered Supplements”). The Act provides a number of factors to be considered in determining whether a supplement is a Covered Supplement, including whether the product contains creatine, a popular ingredient in muscle building supplements, green tea extract, raspberry ketone, garcinia cambogia, or green coffee bean extract, each of which is a popular ingredient in weight loss supplements.
The Act requires retail establishments, defined as entities that sell Covered Supplements to the public in the ordinary course of business (“Retail Establishments”), to require proof of legal age for the in-person purchase of Covered Supplements. The Act provides several acceptable methods of verifying age for in-person transactions involving Covered Supplements, including the following: (a) valid, government-issued driver’s license or identification card, (b) valid passport, (c) military identification card, or (d) student identification card. A Retail Establishment need not verify the age of an individual who reasonably appears to be over the age of 25. Notably, the Retail Establishment cannot use such appearance as an affirmative defense for violations of the Act.
For online transactions involving Covered Supplements, delivery sellers, defined as vendors, including online retailers, who make delivery sales (“Online Sellers”), must use a method of mailing or shipping that requires an individual who is eighteen years of age or older to sign to accept the delivery. This requirement is not accompanied by any exceptions or alternative methods of age verification.
Each violation of the Act is punishable by a civil penalty of up to $1,000, depending on the nature of the circumstances of the violation.
While businesses in the alcohol, tobacco, and similar industries are familiar with the ins and outs of age verification, the same is not necessarily true for Retail Establishments and Online Sellers in the wellness industry. While the implementation of age verification procedures for in-person transactions involving Covered Supplements may pose substantial challenges, especially to smaller entities, the implementation of online age verification procedures will likely be more disruptive for businesses that must comply with the Act. The Act provides a seemingly easy age verification method via the signed acceptance of delivery of Covered Supplements, however, there are no alternative avenues or exceptions to compliance with this requirement. In practice, this will require all customers that order Covered Supplements online to be present and sign for receipt of such delivery. This will be a substantial change to business practices for Online Sellers.
Online Sellers may also determine that, in order to further protect themselves, they will enable online age verification tools, such as those employed by online alcohol and tobacco sellers. If an Online Seller decides to employ such tools, they must strike a balance between stringent compliance with the Act and individual privacy, which may trigger compliance with other states’ data privacy laws, such as laws in California and Virginia. Businesses that are not familiar with the implementation of age verification procedures may have additional questions concerning cost, risk, analysis, and privacy implications.
We are more than happy to provide additional guidance in this area—please feel free to contact us should your business need assistance navigating compliance with the Act.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
© 2023 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
Kennedy Brooks practices in the firm's Business Representation & Transactions Group and is a member of the firm's Data Privacy & Cybersecurity and Intellectual Property & Technology Groups, where she assists individuals and ...
Nicole Cloyd practices in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group and Intellectual Property Group, where she assists individuals and businesses on a broad range of intellectual property and technology ...
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Privacy Laws
- California Consumer Privacy Act
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Class Action Litigation
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Incident Response Plan
- Information Governance
- Corporate Law
- Federal Trade Commission
- Seventh Circuit
- Department of Justice
- New York Bans Sale of Certain Supplements to Minors
- GDPR Compliance: What is Privacy Shield 2.0?
- Connecticut's Data Privacy Law
- The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA)
- The Utah Consumer Privacy Act
- The Colorado Privacy Act
- The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act
- State Data Privacy Law Series
- TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez and the Impact on Class Action Litigation
- 2023: The Year of the CPRA and CDPA - Virginia Joins California in Passing Comprehensive Privacy Legislation