On July 1, 2015, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rules which would require exchange-listed companies to adopt a policy for the recovery of incentive-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement. These rules would implement Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
On April 29, 2015, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) approved the issuance of proposed rules to implement Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), regarding the disclosure of pay versus performance. The proposed rules would require reporting issuers to disclose the relationship between named executive officer “actual” pay and the issuer’s and its peer’s total shareholder return (“TSR”).
This week, the SEC released proposed rules intended to implement Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), which would require SEC reporting companies to disclose in their annual meeting proxy statements whether the company permits its employees (including officers) and directors to hedge equity securities of the company.
As mandated by 2012’s Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”), the Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed amendments to the thresholds at which a company will be required to register its equity securities under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and thus be subject to the Exchange Act’s periodic reporting obligations. Exchange Act registration would now be required only when a company has more than $10 million in assets and a class of equity securities “held of record” by either: (a) 2,000 persons (up from 500 persons), or (b) 500 persons or more who are not “accredited investors” under SEC rules (with the determination being made as of the last day of the fiscal year). The proposal would also amend the threshold requirements for banks or bank holding companies to terminate or suspend the registration of a class of securities under the Exchange Act from 300 to 1,200 persons.
On April 14, 2014 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down part of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) controversial new “Conflict Minerals Rules” requiring publicly-traded companies to disclose whether their products contain certain minerals from certain central African countries. Despite this decision, until further notice public companies should continue to carry out efforts to comply with the SEC’s rules.
In January 2013, the SEC approved the new listing standards proposed by NASDAQ for independent compensation committees and compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors. In November 2013, NASDAQ amended those listing standards and required companies to certify their company’s compliance with, or exemption from, these amended compensation committee listing rules. In January 2014, NASDAQ released the certification form. The certification must be provided to NASDAQ no later than 30 calendar days after the company’s first annual shareholder’s meeting occurring after January 15, 2014, or October 31, 2014, whichever is earlier.
In January 2013, the SEC approved the new listing standards proposed by Nasdaq for independent compensation committees and compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors. These new listing standards, adopted as required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and new SEC Rule 10C-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are designed to promote the independence of compensation committee members, consultants and advisors.
On Wednesday October 23, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted unanimously to propose regulations for equity crowdfunding, which will enable unaccredited U.S. investors to invest in startups and small businesses.
In light of the federal government undergoing a lapse in appropriations effective October 1, 2013, referred to in the news media as the “government shutdown,” it is important to understand which operations of the SEC will continue and which will be discontinued until the shutdown ends.
On September 18, 2013, the SEC issued its long-awaited, and much debated, proposed rules regarding CEO pay ratio disclosures, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in July 2010.
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Securities Regulation
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Nasdaq
- Clawback Rules
- Corporate Law
- Coronavirus
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- IRS
- Government Shutdown
- Tax Planning
- SEC Enforcement
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Dodd-Frank
- House Settlement
- NCAA
- NIL
- Sports
- Taxation
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Tax
- Economic Sanctions
- Proxy Access Rules
- Ohio LLC Act
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Accredited Investors
- Wall Street Reform
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Marketing
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- No More No-Action: SEC Permanently Discontinues Responses to Rule 14a-8 Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests
- SEC Moves to Formally Rescind Climate Disclosure Rules
- SEC Proposes Rules to Permit Optional Semiannual Reporting
- Proxy Season Update: SEC will not respond to Most Shareholder Proposal No-action Requests
- Reg FD Compliance Reminder – Influencer Interview Triggers 8-K Filing
- What Filers Should Know as Government Shutdown Looms
- Ninth Circuit Warning: Silence in the Face of SEC Comment Letters May Bolster Section 12(a)(2) Claims
- House Settlement Approved: College Sports Transition into a New but Familiar Legal Era
- Checking the Box(es): SEC Issues New Guidance Clarifying Clawback Expectations
- Pay vs. Performance and Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules: Will the SEC Retract Rulemaking?