On September 21, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued interpretive guidance on the CEO pay ratio rule. Simultaneously, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued guidance on calculation of the pay ratio and updated C&DIs related to the new guidance. Together, these issuances strongly suggest that the SEC is not modifying or deferring the effectiveness of the rule and that it will be in place for the upcoming 2018 proxy season.
The SEC guidance generally provides more expansive interpretations of three topics: an issuer’s reliance on reasonable assumptions and estimates; an issuer’s use of internal records to determine the median employee and use of non-U.S. employees; and an issuer’s use of other commonly recognized tests to determine employee status (e.g., IRS guidance).
Use of Reasonable Assumptions and Estimates
The SEC noted that the pay ratio rule provides companies with significant flexibility to determine the appropriate methodologies to both identify the median employee as well as calculating the median employee’s annual total compensation. Required disclosure may be based on an issuer’s reasonable belief; use of reasonable estimates, assumptions and methodologies; and reasonable efforts to prepare the disclosures. The Commission acknowledges that perfection is not required given that the data-gathering process and related calculations involve the use of estimates, adjustments and statistical sampling. As such, so long as issuers use reasonable estimates, assumptions, or methodologies, the pay ratio itself and the related disclosure will not provide the basis for an SEC enforcement action, unless the disclosure was made or reaffirmed without a reasonable basis or was provided other than in good faith. The separate C&DI issued permits companies to call the pay ratio disclosure an estimate in any required disclosure.
Use of Internal Records; De Minimis Exemption
The pay ratio rule permits issuers to exempt non-U.S. employees when those employees account for 5% or less of the issuer’s total U.S. and non-U.S. employees. The new SEC guidance provides that issuers may use their internal records, such as tax or payroll records, to determine if the de minimis exemption for foreign employees is available. Issuers may also use internal records for the consistently applied compensation measure (CACM) used to identify the median employee, even if those records do not include every element of compensation, such as equity awards widely distributed to employees. When calculating total compensation for the median employee that the issuer identified using a CACM, the issuer may determine that there are anomalous characteristics of the median employee’s compensation that have a significantly higher or lower impact on the pay ratio. The SEC noted that the issuer may substitute another employee with substantially similar compensation based on the compensation measure used, rather than using a new measure.
In determining whether independent contractors are “employees” for purposes of calculating the pay ratio disclosure, a company is permitted to use widely recognized tests under other areas of law, such as IRS determinations, etc., to determine whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee.
Division of Corporation Finance Guidance:
In addition to the SEC guidance, the Division of Corporation Finance’s guidance provided issuers with examples of how companies can use both statistical sampling and estimates to identify the median employee and to determine his or her annual total compensation. In particular, the guidance notes that issuers may combine the use of reasonable estimates with the use of statistical sampling or other reasonable methodologies. As an example, the SEC noted that an issuer with multinational operations or business units would be permitted to use sampling for some geographic/business units and a combination of other methodologies and estimates for other geographic/business units. Although technical, the guidance is helpful for issuers in their selection of the appropriate sampling method, and includes some of the statistical and other reasonable methodologies below:
- Simple random sampling (drawing at random a certain number of employees);
- Stratified sampling (dividing the employees into groups (‘strata’) based on location, unit, function, etc.);
- Reasonable methods of imputing or correcting missing values;
- Reasonable methods of addressing extreme observations (i.e., outliers);
- Analyzing the composition of the company’s workforce;
- Calculating a CACM and annual total compensation or elements of the annual total compensation of the median employee; and
- Using the mid-point of a compensation range to estimate compensation.
Issuers should consider updating or reassessing their CACM determinations based on this new guidance and should evaluate the methods used and determine whether a combination of methods would be reasonable and appropriate given their facts and circumstances.
KMK Law articles and blog posts are intended to bring attention to developments in the law and are not intended as legal advice for any particular client or any particular situation. The laws/regulations and interpretations thereof are evolving and subject to change. Although we will attempt to update articles/blog posts for material changes, the article/post may not reflect changes in laws/regulations or guidance issued after the date the article/post was published. Please consult with counsel of your choice regarding any specific questions you may have.
© 2020 Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL. All Rights Reserved
Allison Westfall practices in the firm's Business Representation & Transactions Group concentrating in the areas of securities, mergers and acquisitions and business planning. Her practice includes representing ...
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transaction ...
Jim Kennedy practices in the Business Representation & Transactions Group. The focus of his practice is corporate, securities, and financing law, where he has extensive experience in mergers, acquisitions and ...
- Securities Law
- Securities Regulation
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Corporate Law
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Tax Planning
- FAST Act
- Ohio LLC Act
- JOBS Act
- Intellectual Property
- SEC Enforcement
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Corporate Tax
- Real Estate Law
- Consumer Protection Act
- Opportunity Zone
- Corporate Governance
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Conflict Minerals
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Online Trading Platforms
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Director Compensation
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Clawback Rules
- Wall Street Reform
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Business Process Improvement
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Labor & Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Receivership Statute
- Sixth Circuit
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Healthcare Reform
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
- SEC Scales Back Financial Disclosures for Business Combinations
- State of Ohio Issues Urgent Health Advisory and Partial Rescission of “Stay at Home” Order
- SEC Adopts Temporary Rules to Expedite Regulation Crowdfunding Offerings Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
- Treasury Releases PPP Loan Forgiveness Application
- COVID-19 Tort Liability Bills Work Their Way Through the Ohio General Assembly
- SBA Provides Small PPP Loan Borrowers Additional Comfort on Eve of Safe Harbor Deadline
- Hamilton County Small Business Loan Program
- Should I Have My Customers Sign Liability Waivers?
- Paycheck Protection Program - No Deduction for Expenses Allocable to Forgiven Income
- SBA Implements $20 Million Loan Limitation for Business Groups