On December 11, 2019, in response to the SEC’s rejection of its initial primary direct listing proposal, the NYSE filed a revised rule change proposal that would allow issuers to sell newly issued primary shares in a direct listing. A direct listing refers to the listing of a privately held company’s stock for trading on a national stock exchange without conducting an underwritten offering, spin-off or transfer quotation from another regulated stock exchange. The proposal would delay, until 90 trading days after the direct listing, the requirement that an issuer have 400 round lot holders at the time of listing.
As we explained in our September 2019 Snapshot, on August 21, 2019, the SEC issued new guidance regarding the role of proxy advisors in the proxy voting process. We expect this guidance to play an important role in the upcoming 2020 proxy season, as the SEC further defines the voting obligations of registered investment advisors and seeks to promote greater accountability on the part of the proxy advisory firms. Read more here.
On November 5, 2019, the SEC proposed amendments to certain procedural requirements and resubmission thresholds under the shareholder proposal rule of Rule 14a-8.
On November 5, 2019, the SEC proposed amendments to its rules governing proxy solicitations to require proxy advisors to provide to their clients more extensive disclosure of material conflicts of interest.
On October 9, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service released the first new specific tax guidance regarding virtual currency since 2014 as part of its wider effort to educate taxpayers and enforce the tax laws in this rapidly changing area. The new guidance, in the form of Revenue Ruling 2019-24 and a set of Frequently Asked Questions posted to its website, reiterates the Service’s position that virtual currency, including cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin, is property for federal income tax purposes.
On October 16, 2019, the Division issued a bulletin providing guidance on certain issues arising under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8. The bulletin addressed the “ordinary business” exception under Rule 14a-8(i)(7), which allows a company to exclude from its proxy statement certain proposals that “deal[ ] with a matter relating to the company’s ordinary business operations.” The applicability of the exception is based on (1) the subject matter of the proposal and (2) the degree to which the proposal involves the “micromanagement” of the company. A bulletin is not a rule ...
On September 26, 2019, the SEC adopted final rules permitting all companies to gauge market interest in registered offerings (including possible initial public offerings) through “testing the waters” by reaching out to certain institutional investors before filing a registration statement. Prior to these rules, only emerging growth companies had been able to engage in this activity under provisions of the JOBS Act. New Securities Act Rule 163B will allow any issuer to engage in oral or written communications with potential investors who are (or are reasonably believed to ...
On August 21, 2019, the SEC issued an interpretation and related guidance regarding the applicability of certain rules to proxy advisory firms. The SEC interpretation imposes new regulatory oversight on proxy advisory firms that clarifies that proxy advisers are subject to Rule 14a-9 and the anti-fraud rules concerning materially false or misleading statements.
We expect proxy advisory firms will provide additional disclosures in in their reports in response to the guidance, such as:
- Explanations of the methodology used to formulate voting advice;
 - Disclosures of peer group ...
 
On August 8, 2019, the SEC proposed rule amendments to modernize the business, legal proceedings and risk factors disclosures that public companies are required to make pursuant to Regulation S-K.
The proposed amendments to Items 101(a), 101(c) and 105 would focus on a principles-based approach to allow companies to address the particular aspects of these disclosures that are material to each company. Under amended Item 101(a), companies would be required to disclose information only to the extent it is material to an understanding of the development of the company’s business. ...
On July 31, 2019, the SEC and North American Securities Administrators Association published a staff statement on “opportunity zones” and related compliance implications under federal and state securities laws considerations.
In general, the statement indicated that interests in a “qualified opportunity zone” (QOF), which is an investment vehicle organized as a corporation or partnership to invest in qualified opportunity zone property, will be considered securities within the purview of federal and state securities laws, except under limited circumstances.
As ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
 - Securities Regulation
 - SEC
 - Regulation Fair Disclosure
 - Government Shutdown
 - Corporate Transparency Act
 - Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
 - Clawback Rules
 - Nasdaq
 - Corporate Law
 - Coronavirus
 - IRS
 - Tax Planning
 - House Settlement
 - NCAA
 - NIL
 - Sports
 - Cybersecurity Regulation
 - SEC Enforcement
 - EDGAR
 - EDGAR Next
 - Dodd-Frank
 - Taxation
 - Mergers & Acquisitions
 - Paycheck Protection Program
 - JOBS Act
 - Corporate Governance
 - Corporate Tax
 - FAST Act
 - Consumer Protection Act
 - Economic Sanctions
 - Ohio LLC Act
 - Proxy Access Rules
 - Securities Litigation
 - Crowdfunding
 - Conflict Minerals
 - Cryptocurrency
 - Hedging
 - Real Estate Law
 - Emerging Growth Companies
 - Investors
 - Pay Ratio Disclosure
 - Whistleblower
 - Private Offerings
 - Intellectual Property
 - Technology
 - Opportunity Zone
 - LIBOR
 - Executive Compensation
 - Health Care Act
 - Accredited Investors
 - Sales Tax
 - United States Supreme Court
 - Online Trading Platforms
 - Wall Street Reform
 - IPO
 - Registration Statement
 - Annual Reports
 - Family-Controlled Entities
 - Gift and Estate Transfers
 - Ohio Foreclosure Reform
 - Director Compensation
 - Board of Directors
 - Director Independence
 - Cyber Insurance
 - Data Breach
 - Lenders
 - Receivership Statute
 - Regulation A
 - Regulation D
 - Total Shareholder Return
 - Compensation Committee Certification
 - CDEs
 - CDFI Fund
 - Community Development Entities
 - Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
 - New Markets Tax Credit
 - NMTC
 - NMTC Financing
 - Social Media
 - Benefits
 - Healthcare Reform
 - Litigation
 - Marketing
 - Public Company Transition Rules
 - Employment Incentives
 - HIRE Act
 - Social Security Tax
 - Tax Credit
 
Recent Posts
- Reg FD Compliance Reminder – Influencer Interview Triggers 8-K Filing
 - What Filers Should Know as Government Shutdown Looms
 - Ninth Circuit Warning: Silence in the Face of SEC Comment Letters May Bolster Section 12(a)(2) Claims
 - House Settlement Approved: College Sports Transition into a New but Familiar Legal Era
 - Checking the Box(es): SEC Issues New Guidance Clarifying Clawback Expectations
 - Pay vs. Performance and Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules: Will the SEC Retract Rulemaking?
 - Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Eliminates Reporting Obligations for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons
 - Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Will Not Enforce the CTA Until Interim Rule is Effective
 - Corporate Transparency Act Update: Injunction Lifted - Corporate Transparency Act Back in Effect
 - Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Says Reporting Obligations Remain On Hold