On April 30, 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) released new guidance detailing its evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of a company’s compliance program (the “Guidance”). The Guidance spells out how prosecutors examine compliance programs when deciding whether to monitor, fine or file criminal charges against a company, and we believe the 18-page document is the most comprehensive and detailed corporate compliance document that informs all businesses, whether or not party to a DOJ enforcement action. The Guidance includes a step-by-step approach to compliance, centering around three fundamental questions: Is the company’s compliance program well designed? Is the program being implemented effectively? And does the company’s compliance program work in practice?
When evaluating whether a company’s compliance program is adequately designed to prevent and detect wrongdoing by employees as well as management’s commitment to the program, the Guidance considers five factors: if the company has tailored its risks to its business; whether the company’s policies and procedures adequately address such risks; whether the company’s training programs and methods of communications are effective; if employees can anonymously and confidentially report misconduct; and whether a company applies a risk-based due diligence approach to its third-party relationships.
When determining whether a company’s compliance program is implemented effectively rather than having a mere “paper program” in place, the Guidance considers the following elements: whether senior managements leads by example; if the compliance department is appropriately staffed and adequately resourced; and whether the program incentivizes compliance and has appropriate disciplinary procedures that are consistently enforced.
When considering whether a company’s compliance program works in practice, the Guidance considers these elements: whether the company engaged in meaningful efforts to review and update its compliance program; and whether the company has an effective and appropriately funded mechanism to provide for timely, thorough and independent investigations undertaken by qualified personnel.
All companies should review and evaluate their compliance programs in light of the recent Guidance.
- Partner
Jim Kennedy practices in the Business Representation & Transactions Group. The focus of his practice is corporate, securities, and financing law, where he has extensive experience in mergers, acquisitions and ...
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transaction ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
- Partner
Chris Brinkman practices in the firm's Business Representation & Transactions Group with a concentration in venture capital transactions, start-ups & growth companies, securities, and mergers and acquisitions.
Chris ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- Securities Regulation
- SEC
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Corporate Law
- Clawback Rules
- Nasdaq
- SEC Enforcement
- Coronavirus
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Dodd-Frank
- Tax Planning
- IRS
- Economic Sanctions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Ohio LLC Act
- Corporate Tax
- JOBS Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Governance
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Consumer Protection Act
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Crowdfunding
- Cryptocurrency
- Conflict Minerals
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Taxation
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Private Offerings
- Whistleblower
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Online Trading Platforms
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Wall Street Reform
- Annual Reports
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- FinCEN Extends the Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Deadline for Newly Created Entities
- SEC Postpones Share Repurchase Modernization Disclosure Rules
- Effective Date of SEC Clawback Rule Finally In Sight
- SEC Sued Over Newly Adopted Share Repurchase Rules
- SEC Extends Period to Act on Exchange Clawback Rules
- SEC Charges Public Company for Misleading Non-GAAP Disclosures
- NYSE and Nasdaq Propose Clawback Listing Standards: What You Need to Know
- Corporate Transparency Act Update – FinCEN Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
- SEC Amends Insider Trading Rules: New Conditions, Requirements, and Related Disclosures
- SEC Reopens Comment Period for 11 Proposed Rules Due to Technological Error