On April 30, 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) released new guidance detailing its evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of a company’s compliance program (the “Guidance”). The Guidance spells out how prosecutors examine compliance programs when deciding whether to monitor, fine or file criminal charges against a company, and we believe the 18-page document is the most comprehensive and detailed corporate compliance document that informs all businesses, whether or not party to a DOJ enforcement action. The Guidance includes a step-by-step approach to compliance, centering around three fundamental questions: Is the company’s compliance program well designed? Is the program being implemented effectively? And does the company’s compliance program work in practice?
When evaluating whether a company’s compliance program is adequately designed to prevent and detect wrongdoing by employees as well as management’s commitment to the program, the Guidance considers five factors: if the company has tailored its risks to its business; whether the company’s policies and procedures adequately address such risks; whether the company’s training programs and methods of communications are effective; if employees can anonymously and confidentially report misconduct; and whether a company applies a risk-based due diligence approach to its third-party relationships.
When determining whether a company’s compliance program is implemented effectively rather than having a mere “paper program” in place, the Guidance considers the following elements: whether senior managements leads by example; if the compliance department is appropriately staffed and adequately resourced; and whether the program incentivizes compliance and has appropriate disciplinary procedures that are consistently enforced.
When considering whether a company’s compliance program works in practice, the Guidance considers these elements: whether the company engaged in meaningful efforts to review and update its compliance program; and whether the company has an effective and appropriately funded mechanism to provide for timely, thorough and independent investigations undertaken by qualified personnel.
All companies should review and evaluate their compliance programs in light of the recent Guidance.
- Partner
Jim Kennedy practices in the Business Representation & Transactions Group. The focus of his practice is corporate, securities, and financing law, where he has extensive experience in mergers, acquisitions and ...
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transaction ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
- Partner
Chris Brinkman practices in the firm's Business Representation & Transactions Group with a concentration in venture capital transactions, start-ups & growth companies, securities, and mergers and acquisitions.
Chris ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Nasdaq
- Securities Regulation
- Clawback Rules
- Corporate Law
- Coronavirus
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Tax Planning
- Dodd-Frank
- IRS
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Corporate Tax
- JOBS Act
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- FAST Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- SEC Enforcement
- Crowdfunding
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Conflict Minerals
- Real Estate Law
- Taxation
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Private Offerings
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Wall Street Reform
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- NYSE and Nasdaq Propose Clawback Listing Standards: What You Need to Know
- Corporate Transparency Act Update – FinCEN Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
- SEC Amends Insider Trading Rules: New Conditions, Requirements, and Related Disclosures
- SEC Reopens Comment Period for 11 Proposed Rules Due to Technological Error
- Corporate Transparency Act Update—FinCEN Issues Final Rule
- SEC Provides Sample Guidance on Disclosure of Russia-Ukraine Invasion
- Proposed SEC Climate-Related Disclosure Requirements
- Proposed SEC Cybersecurity Rules
- International Unrest and its Impact on M&A
- The United States Ramps Up Severe Economic Sanctions on Russia and Export Controls