On April 30, 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) released new guidance detailing its evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of a company’s compliance program (the “Guidance”). The Guidance spells out how prosecutors examine compliance programs when deciding whether to monitor, fine or file criminal charges against a company, and we believe the 18-page document is the most comprehensive and detailed corporate compliance document that informs all businesses, whether or not party to a DOJ enforcement action. The Guidance includes a step-by-step approach to compliance, centering around three fundamental questions: Is the company’s compliance program well designed? Is the program being implemented effectively? And does the company’s compliance program work in practice?
When evaluating whether a company’s compliance program is adequately designed to prevent and detect wrongdoing by employees as well as management’s commitment to the program, the Guidance considers five factors: if the company has tailored its risks to its business; whether the company’s policies and procedures adequately address such risks; whether the company’s training programs and methods of communications are effective; if employees can anonymously and confidentially report misconduct; and whether a company applies a risk-based due diligence approach to its third-party relationships.
When determining whether a company’s compliance program is implemented effectively rather than having a mere “paper program” in place, the Guidance considers the following elements: whether senior managements leads by example; if the compliance department is appropriately staffed and adequately resourced; and whether the program incentivizes compliance and has appropriate disciplinary procedures that are consistently enforced.
When considering whether a company’s compliance program works in practice, the Guidance considers these elements: whether the company engaged in meaningful efforts to review and update its compliance program; and whether the company has an effective and appropriately funded mechanism to provide for timely, thorough and independent investigations undertaken by qualified personnel.
All companies should review and evaluate their compliance programs in light of the recent Guidance.
- Partner
Jim Kennedy practices in the Business Representation & Transactions Group. The focus of his practice is corporate, securities, and financing law, where he has extensive experience in mergers, acquisitions and ...
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transaction ...
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
- Associate
Chris Brinkman practices in the firm's Business Representation & Transactions Group with a concentration in venture capital/private equity, start-ups & growth companies, securities, and mergers and acquisitions. Chris ...
- Associate
Brett Niehauser represents corporate clients in a variety of business transactions, as well as advising publicly-held clients on matters related to SEC reporting and compliance, the listing standards of the New York Stock ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Coronavirus
- Securities Regulation
- Tax Planning
- Corporate Tax
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Law
- Taxation
- Paycheck Protection Program
- IRS
- Private Offerings
- Dodd-Frank
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- FAST Act
- JOBS Act
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- SEC Enforcement
- Hedging
- Crowdfunding
- Consumer Protection Act
- Corporate Governance
- Real Estate Law
- Ohio LLC Act
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Conflict Minerals
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Litigation
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Director Compensation
- Wall Street Reform
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Clawback Rules
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Business Process Improvement
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Labor & Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Sixth Circuit
- Compensation Committee Certification
- Government Shutdown
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Stimulus Package Reverses IRS’s Position on Deductibility of PPP Expenses and Other Loan Forgiveness Issues
- Nasdaq Proposes New Listing Rules to Advance Board Diversity: Comply or Explain
- More Disclosure Modernization: SEC Adopts Significant Amendments to Financial Disclosure Rules
- SEC Eases Limits and Rules on Private Offerings
- SEC Proposes Conditional Exemption for "Finders" Involved in Capital Raising
- Ohio Adopts Protections for Ohio Businesses from Coronavirus - Related Lawsuits
- SEC Scales Back Financial Disclosures for Business Combinations
- State of Ohio Issues Urgent Health Advisory and Partial Rescission of “Stay at Home” Order
- SEC Adopts Temporary Rules to Expedite Regulation Crowdfunding Offerings Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
- Treasury Releases PPP Loan Forgiveness Application