On April 14, 2014 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down part of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) controversial new “Conflict Minerals Rules” requiring publicly-traded companies to disclose whether their products contain certain minerals from certain central African countries. Despite this decision, until further notice public companies should continue to carry out efforts to comply with the SEC’s rules.
The D.C. Circuit held that the rules unconstitutionally sought to compel speech by requiring public companies to disclose their use of conflict minerals. The majority opinion stated that the requirement to disclose this information goes beyond disclosure that is merely factual and non-ideological and “requires an issuer to tell consumers that its products are ethically tainted,” and leaves a company unable to use its free speech right to dispute that assessment by remaining silent. The opinion continued by stating that the rule interferes with the First Amendment right to freedom of speech “by compelling an issuer to confess blood on its hands.” The dispute will now be sent back to the district court for further proceedings.
Despite its ruling, the D.C. Circuit stopped short of broadly invalidating the rule, upholding such requirements as having companies investigate whether their products include conflict minerals and file public reports on their investigations beginning in June. Companies will no longer, however, be required to list the specific products that might contain these minerals.
The SEC has estimated that compliance costs for the final rule would be $3 to $4 billion initially and $207 to $609 million annually thereafter. The rule has been opposed by pro-business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, which groups issued a statement that they were “pleased” with the ruling.
The case is National Association of Manufacturers v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 13-5252, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia (Washington).
- Partner
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transaction ...
- Partner
Jim Kennedy practices in the Business Representation & Transactions Group. The focus of his practice is corporate, securities, and financing law, where he has extensive experience in mergers, acquisitions and ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Coronavirus
- Securities Regulation
- Tax Planning
- Corporate Tax
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Law
- Taxation
- Paycheck Protection Program
- IRS
- Private Offerings
- Dodd-Frank
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- FAST Act
- JOBS Act
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- SEC Enforcement
- Hedging
- Crowdfunding
- Consumer Protection Act
- Corporate Governance
- Real Estate Law
- Ohio LLC Act
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Conflict Minerals
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Litigation
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Director Compensation
- Wall Street Reform
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Clawback Rules
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Business Process Improvement
- Employer Policies
- Employment Litigation
- Labor & Employment Law
- Labor Law
- Sixth Circuit
- Compensation Committee Certification
- Government Shutdown
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- Stimulus Package Reverses IRS’s Position on Deductibility of PPP Expenses and Other Loan Forgiveness Issues
- Nasdaq Proposes New Listing Rules to Advance Board Diversity: Comply or Explain
- More Disclosure Modernization: SEC Adopts Significant Amendments to Financial Disclosure Rules
- SEC Eases Limits and Rules on Private Offerings
- SEC Proposes Conditional Exemption for "Finders" Involved in Capital Raising
- Ohio Adopts Protections for Ohio Businesses from Coronavirus - Related Lawsuits
- SEC Scales Back Financial Disclosures for Business Combinations
- State of Ohio Issues Urgent Health Advisory and Partial Rescission of “Stay at Home” Order
- SEC Adopts Temporary Rules to Expedite Regulation Crowdfunding Offerings Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
- Treasury Releases PPP Loan Forgiveness Application