Recently, the European Union Court of Justice invalidated a Safe Harbor Framework (established in 2000), which thousands of companies relied upon to facilitate the transfer, processing and storage of data from the EU to the U.S. The Court also empowered EU national authorities to investigate individual complaints regarding the transfer and storage of personal data outside the EU.
Some companies may have protective language in their contracts and others may have separately negotiated agreements (often known as Binding Corporate Rules), which offer some safeguards. EU and U.S. authorities also are trying to negotiate a new agreement with safe harbor protections in light of this ruling, but those negotiations are going to take time.
Any company that processes and stores data from the EU, including customer and employee personal data, should be reviewing its contracts and procedures and monitoring these developments.
Topics/Tags
Select- SEC
- Securities Law
- Securities Regulation
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Nasdaq
- Clawback Rules
- Corporate Law
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Government Shutdown
- Coronavirus
- IRS
- Tax Planning
- SEC Enforcement
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Dodd-Frank
- House Settlement
- NCAA
- NIL
- Sports
- Taxation
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Governance
- Consumer Protection Act
- Corporate Tax
- FAST Act
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Health Care Act
- LIBOR
- Opportunity Zone
- Executive Compensation
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Wall Street Reform
- Online Trading Platforms
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Compensation Committee Certification
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- SEC Moves to Formally Rescind Climate Disclosure Rules
- SEC Proposes Rules to Permit Optional Semiannual Reporting
- Proxy Season Update: SEC will not respond to Most Shareholder Proposal No-action Requests
- Reg FD Compliance Reminder – Influencer Interview Triggers 8-K Filing
- What Filers Should Know as Government Shutdown Looms
- Ninth Circuit Warning: Silence in the Face of SEC Comment Letters May Bolster Section 12(a)(2) Claims
- House Settlement Approved: College Sports Transition into a New but Familiar Legal Era
- Checking the Box(es): SEC Issues New Guidance Clarifying Clawback Expectations
- Pay vs. Performance and Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules: Will the SEC Retract Rulemaking?
- Corporate Transparency Act Update: FinCEN Eliminates Reporting Obligations for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons